Re: [Wxlua-users] wxLua Compiles and works in Linux

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

> I am a bit confused by having setup.h of wxWidgest and the one fro
> luasetup.h.
> I think that luasetup.h should at least take into a ccount what is
> already done in setup.h.
> e.g. No FL, then luasetup.h should not see it. It makes no sence
> otherewise, since it will not compile.
> What is the current way this is decided?

The wxWidgets setup.h *is* used in the bindings. luasetup.h is just a
way to trim down the size of the bindings library.

> >>why would user need to override the output library name ?
> >>Also, the output path should be the usual wxLua/lib...
> >
> >To have two different compiled versions of lib_wxluabind, see above.
> >
> I think to build directories will have the same effect, and might be a
> better solution.
> Like in Cmake one chooses the build directory. But since in bakefile the
> build dir is already defined,
> a copy should do. ( understand it is small enough, and lib dirs etc. are
> all defined in there. ).

The biggest problem, I think, is how to use two luasetup.h files
without having to copy the new one into place between builds.

Regards,
    John Labenski