Re: [Wxlua-users] wxLua Compiles and works in Linux

[k. h. <kla...@nl...>]

Hi,

I hope to switch soon, but try on MSW had some problems ( wil report 
them this evening ).
Happy to see some movement :-)

John Labenski wrote:

>
>The way I see it is that you need to get all the things in luasetup.h
>defined independently for each instance of the library and you need to
>either give the library a different name or destination dir.
>  
>
I thought Franscesco made something for that.
At least Cmake does this always, and i asked for something simular for 
bakefile.
So one could have several build directories next to eachother.
I agree that building to/in several build directories and/or destination 
directories is a must.

I am a bit confused by having setup.h of wxWidgest and the one fro 
luasetup.h.
I think that luasetup.h should at least take into a ccount what is 
already done in setup.h.
e.g. No FL, then luasetup.h should not see it. It makes no sence 
otherewise, since it will not compile.
What is the current way this is decided?

>  
>
>>>      
>>>
>>why would user need to override the output library name ?
>>Also, the output path should be the usual wxLua/lib...
>>    
>>
>
>To have two different compiled versions of lib_wxluabind, see above.
>  
>
I think to build directories will have the same effect, and might be a 
better solution.
Like in Cmake one chooses the build directory. But since in bakefile the 
build dir is already defined,
a copy should do. ( understand it is small enough, and lib dirs etc. are 
all defined in there. ).

Or do you also want to install ( /user/local/lib ) different version??

Thanks John and Francesco!

Klaas






-- 
Unclassified