Re: [Wxlua-users] wxbind/include/wxbind.h

[klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...>]

John Labenski wrote:

>Does this make more sense, even though we probably shouldn't do it yet
>(until we know if there are better wrappers or now)... this is how I
>envision it will work.
>  
>
I do understand more or less what you write. But i do not understand why 
the wxLuaBinding i see now, is not good enough, which i think is the 
case from what you have in mind. Don't  get me wrong, i do not critisize 
:-), just don't understand.
e.g. i see in wxbind.h
class wx_binding

and next

bool bind_wx( .. )

Where did this wxLuaBinding class come from, it is not in my wxArt2D 
version, so i assume Ray or you made it?
What is the current system capable of? 
Or where is it not good enough, i don't have a clue :-(?
How does your idea differ from what is there now?

Sorry John this is all new to me, so i have to study a bit more, to be 
able to answer if i understand or not. But if you can tell me a bit more 
on what is there, i think i will get it quicker ;-)

Thanks,

Klaas