Re: [Wxlua-users] Extended Toolbar, a new example of wxLua code.

[The D. <the...@bl...>]

John Labenski <jla...@gm...> wrote:
(22/07/2005 22:32)

>Thanks, the samples probably need to be cleaned up a bit. Nothing
>special, just make them have the same coding style and demo a couple
>more things. I'll add parts of this once we get the c++ side going
>again.
>

Why use parts of it and not the whole? I'd like it used as it is, or near enough, as I solved several significant obstacles to handling tools on a toolbar, which as you say, don't behave as ordinary windows do. My coding style is not standard, but it's consistent, compact and efficient, and even that's secondary to to the content.

In the samples, where there is a significant original work to demonstrate features of wxLua, there is an intact script with the credit of the author intact in it. I'd like mine to be treated the same way. What about having a second directory of samples from users, left entirely intact, on a caveat emptor basis? :) That way I get full credit, at least somewhere in the distribution, for my help for it, and others can learn from it as I learned for myself, from whatever intact examples I find. Sometimes it's better to see various sources, rather than one central interpretation. This helped me in JavaScript, and the same probably applies to wxLua. If nothing else, if you do this, any eccentricity or flaw in the code will be solely credited to me, as well as any merit.


>You already have word wrap off, and it makes responding to your
>messages difficult, but in this case it works well. :)
>

This is why most clients have wordwrap for viewing. :) I decided that this was better, as I can always see the size of my own windows, but rarely the size of anyone elses.
To be fair, most email clients make this weird mistake, hell knows why..

Crow.