Re: [wxlua-users] recursive calls runbuffer

[klaas.holwerda <ng...@kl...>]

Hi John,

Indeed if out commented, it works okay again.
So recursive calls is not the problem it seems, only the assert.
Don't know if the m_is_running is very important, but if yes or just handy to have, i think the 
up/down counter would deal with the situation.

Regards,

Klaas

On 04/02/2014 06:01 AM, John Labenski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:11 PM, klaas.holwerda <ng...@kl... 
> <mailto:ng...@kl...>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Recursive calls to RunBuffer() is a problem, gives an assert.
>
>     int wxLuaState::RunBuffer(const char buf[], size_t size, const wxString &name, int nresults)
>     {
>          wxCHECK_MSG(Ok(), LUA_ERRRUN, wxT("Invalid wxLuaState"));
>      wxCHECK_MSG(!M_WXLSTATEDATA->m_wxlStateData->m_is_running, LUA_ERRRUN, wxT("Lua interpreter is
>     already running"));
>
>
> If you rem these out does it work normally? I think I added the check so people wouldn't forget 
> that it was running, but there probably is any reason why it wouldn't work