From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2014-02-20 17:47:54
|
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Paul K <pau...@ya...> wrote: > I didn't realize we don't have wxWebView binding. I'm very much > interested in that as well. > > wxWebView shouldn't be too hard to wrap, it looks like a single c++ header file and a new lib to link to, wx30+ only. > I asked previously about wxPropertyGrid, but I believe John said that > it's going to be more work than seems from the API, so I found a > different way to do what I wanted. > > Yes, wxPropertyGrid is a huge project with lots of little helper classes. Admittedly, most people need only a tiny part of it. I remember that there was something funny about it though, something about #defines and pointers that seemed like wrapping it might be awkward, but looking now I don't see why I thought that. John |