Re: [wxlua-users] Compilation errors with latest wxlua (2.8.12.3; rev 165)

[Paul K <pau...@ya...>]

> To be honest, this this not something I have any interest in
> implementing. Even if it was made to work by silently ignoring missing
> parts then people who wanted to use the wxLua package as a whole may
> end up missing parts by accident and that would be far worse then you
> having extra parts. I recommend simply building it as is and taking
> the parts you want.

That is what I ended up doing. Thanks for taking look at this.

Paul.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, John Labenski <jla...@gm...> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Paul K <pau...@ya...> wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>>> You can already do that too... see CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY here :
>>> http://wxlua.sourceforge.net/docs/install.html#C4
>>
>> I added -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=TRUE and ran "make
>> wxLuaModule" (to get wx.* library), but still got the same error and
>> didn't get to wx.* file:
>>
>
> To be honest, this this not something I have any interest in
> implementing. Even if it was made to work by silently ignoring missing
> parts then people who wanted to use the wxLua package as a whole may
> end up missing parts by accident and that would be far worse then you
> having extra parts. I recommend simply building it as is and taking
> the parts you want.
>
> Regards,
>     John
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> wxlua-users mailing list
> wxl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users