Re: [wxlua-users] binding MACRO

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:36 PM, klaas.holwerda <ng...@kl...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lately i need to outcomment
> WXLUA_IMPLEMENT_BIND_STD
>
> and replace it by:
>      WXLUA_IMPLEMENT_BIND_WXLUA
>      WXLUA_IMPLEMENT_BIND_WXBASE
>      WXLUA_IMPLEMENT_BIND_WXCORE
>
> else i get errors like this:
>
> Linking CXX executable maskproc
> CMakeFiles/maskproc.dir/maskprocmain.cpp.o: In function `MyApp::OnInit()':
> maskprocmain.cpp:(.text+0x2330): undefined reference to `wxLuaBinding_wxadv_init()'
> maskprocmain.cpp:(.text+0x2335): undefined reference to `wxLuaBinding_wxnet_init()'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [src/maskproc] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/maskproc.dir/all] Error 2
> make: *** [all] Error 2

Are you using this  CMake generated file in your build?

build/buildwxLua-config.cmake

At the bottom is a macro() you can call to "SETUP_wxLua" to work at
the directory level or you can simply add the wxLua_CXX_DEFINITIONS to
your target.

# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Add the compiler flags in the variable wxLua_CXX_DEFINITIONS to your target
# or call the SETUP_wxLua() macro in any directory that has targets that use the
# macros in modules/wxbind/include/wxbinddefs.h to initialize the
wxWidgets bindings.
set(wxLua_CXX_DEFINITIONS
"-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXGL=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXSTC=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXXRC=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXRICHTEXT=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXHTML=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXMEDIA=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXAUI=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXADV=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXCORE=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXXML=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXNET=1;-DwxLUA_USEBINDING_WXBASE=1")
macro(SETUP_wxLua)
    add_definitions(${wxLua_CXX_DEFINITIONS})
endmacro(SETUP_wxLua)


Are you already doing this or when you do use them does it work then,
it should, since the WXLUA_IMPLEMENT_BIND_STD should configure itself
based on these #defines.

Note that I may eventually switch this over to an #include file since
it does seem like a lot of command-line args to gcc to me.

Regards,
    John