From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2009-05-11 19:48:11
|
Hi John, Klaas, John Labenski ha scritto: > I don't see how to automatically test for this, but we could add a > condition USE_GDIPLUS as wxWidgets does. Francesco, do you think this > would work? > ... > Put this after the line "<sys-lib>odbc32</sys-lib>" in wx.blk > <sys-lib>$(GDIPLUS_LIB)</sys-lib> > > ============================================ > So I tried puttting this into wxCode's wx_win32.bkl and the output code > looks ok, but it's not tested. The dsp and vcproj are unchanged, but the > makefile.vc <http://makefile.vc> should work. I think it should just be fine. I think that in fact we have no changes we need to preserve in wxCode wxpresets bakefiles respect official wxpresets. We keep a copy there just to facilitate baking for wxCode maintainers... so that probably we can just overwrite wxCode's wxpresets with wx2.8.10 wxpresets... > A second bakefile related problem is that building debug and release of > wxstedit, both result in the same library name: > wcode_msw28_stedit > > But for debug it should generate: > > wcode_msw28d_stedit > > > I have rebaked the wxstedit build files in CVS and I see that the dsp > files put a 'd' in for debug so I assume that the makefile.vc > <http://makefile.vc> should too. Looking at the makefile.vc I see that the lib target is called: ..\lib\vc_$(____stedit_lib__DIRNAME_SHARED_SUFFIX_FILENAMES)\wxcode_msw$(WX_VERSION)$(WXLIBPOSTFIX)_stedit.lib and WXLIBPOSTFIX seems to be set correctly (i.e. contains 'u' and 'd' flags when required) so that I think everything is ok. Bye, Francesco |