|
From: Martin V. <mar...@hu...> - 2001-01-10 01:21:04
|
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 07:24:09PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfr...@si...> ... > Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:24:09 -0600 (CST) > > If libwmf (and associated libraries) where to be built using GNU > libtool (and therefore be available as shared libraries), there would > be substantial benefit to packages (like ImageMagick) that need to > link against shared libraries in some cases. Is this a direction that > libwmf is expecting to go? > > Bob > ====================================== > Bob Friesenhahn > bfr...@si... > http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen Bob, just in: A mail from Matej Vela who maintains the Debian libwmf, who has patched in libtool support. The patch (which is LARGE) is at http://www.debian.org/~vela/libwmf-libtool.patch and contains some other improvements too. Would you (or anyone else) want to take this for a test drive? It looks OK and I'm going to build and try it. If it works out (as I expect), I will commit. But the more that test it, the better. Regards Martin -- Martin Vermeer mar...@hu... Helsinki University of Technology Department of Surveying P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland :wq |