Re: [wsjt-devel] strange response

[Al <K0...@ar...>]

Yes, but why did my last TX (73) change his call sign to 1W.  I did not 
change his call sign manually.

AL, K0VM

On 7/13/2020 12:16 PM, Franz (OE3FVU _ PE0WGA) wrote:
>
> He is informing you that his power is 1 Watt.
>
> Best 73
>
> Franz - OE3FVU
>
> (also PE0WGA, ex-PE3FVU, ex-PA0WGA)
>
> /_144MHz DX stations meet at *www.on4kst.com <http://www.on4kst.com/>*_/
>
> *From**:*Frode Igland <fro...@gm...>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 13, 2020 7:02 PM
> *To:* WSJT software development <wsj...@li...>
> *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] strange response
>
> In the Log QSO window the call sign is changed from W5KDJ to 1W. Did 
> that happen automatically as that was the "call sign" in the RR73 
> message that initiated the logging procedure, or is that entered 
> manually by K0VM?
>
> 73  Frode LA6VQ
>
> man. 13. jul. 2020 kl. 17:56 skrev Bill Somerville 
> <g4...@cl... <mailto:g4...@cl...>>:
>
>     On 13/07/2020 16:44, Bill Somerville wrote:
>
>         On 13/07/2020 16:21, Al wrote:
>
>             (wsjt-x 2.2.2 Win10 2004 )
>             FYI..
>             This sequence ended strangely..
>
>
>             AL, K0VM
>
>         Hi Al,
>
>         nothing strange there. You QSO partner acknowledged your
>         report to him, on the third resend with a non-standard
>         message, something he can do as his callsign is sufficiently
>         short and he chose not to address it to your callsign. He has
>         sent the equivalent of an RR73 message and can be seen going
>         immediately on to working another station, so I think you are
>         perfectly OK to log the QSO as complete two-way. There must
>         always be some doubt that the message "R 1W W5KDJ 73" was
>         actually addressed to you, but given the context it is
>         probably fine.
>
>         73
>         Bill
>         G4WJS.
>
>     Hi Al,
>
>     note that, critically, if there had been an extra pair of periods
>     between the CQ by W5KDJ at 151200, and his response at 151230,
>     with no decoded message from W5KDJ. Then you could make no such
>     assumption since he could be signing off with a completely
>     different station, i.e. not with you.
>
>     73
>     Bill
>     G4WJS.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     wsjt-devel mailing list
>     wsj...@li...
>     <mailto:wsj...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel