Hi,
In the script.sh :
# If a 32-bit wrapper binary exists then it will work on 32 or 64 bit
# platforms, if the 64-bit binary exists then the distribution most
# likely wants to use long names. Otherwise, look for the default.
I don't understand why the 32-bit wrapper binary is used even if we are on a
64-bit platform with a wrapper 64-bit available (Precision : 32 and 64 bits
wrapper are available in my source code but 32 bits wrapper is always
used...).
I tested my application today on ubuntu 64 bits and an error occured due to
the use of 32 bit wrapper.
If i forced the use of 64 bits wrapped, it works...
Why there is not a test on 32/64 bits platform to use the appropriate
wrapper ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wrapper-32-bits-used-on-64-bits-platform-tp18713449p18713449.html
Sent from the Java Service Wrapper mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
