|
From: papinade <pap...@gm...> - 2008-07-29 14:28:43
|
Hi, In the script.sh : # If a 32-bit wrapper binary exists then it will work on 32 or 64 bit # platforms, if the 64-bit binary exists then the distribution most # likely wants to use long names. Otherwise, look for the default. I don't understand why the 32-bit wrapper binary is used even if we are on a 64-bit platform with a wrapper 64-bit available (Precision : 32 and 64 bits wrapper are available in my source code but 32 bits wrapper is always used...). I tested my application today on ubuntu 64 bits and an error occured due to the use of 32 bit wrapper. If i forced the use of 64 bits wrapped, it works... Why there is not a test on 32/64 bits platform to use the appropriate wrapper ? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wrapper-32-bits-used-on-64-bits-platform-tp18713449p18713449.html Sent from the Java Service Wrapper mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |