You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(29) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(68) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(160) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(78) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(75) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(70) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(83) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(77) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(106) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(64) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(54) |
Dec
(37) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(45) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(24) |
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Christian M. <chr...@ta...> - 2011-02-08 07:19:52
|
John, Could you set the loglevel to debug and reproduce the ClassNotFoundException you are seeing (And send it to me?) >From the debug output I can see the exact java command line the wrapper is producing and should get a better grasp on what might be the reason for your problem. Please set this in your conf file: wrapper.debug=true Also please note that in the conf file a hash marks the beginning of a comment. As you have set the property right now, the Wrapper won't read any further than the first #. Therefore you should quote the property to make sure it catches the whole line: wrapper.java.additional.n="-*javaagent*:%APP_HOME%\*tierext*\*lib*\*plugins* -instrument-agent.jar=app.launch.properties=%APP_HOME%\*tierext*\*jboss*\* conf*\jbLaunch.properties#optier.instrumented.jboss=true#jb.version=5" Best Regards, Christian 2011/2/8 John Aronson <joh...@op...> > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to add a –javaagent parameter with my wrapper configuration and > Im’, running into a problem. I think it’s because the wrapper class can’t > parse the javaagent argument correctly. > > > > The arg I added was [note there’s multiple ‘=’ in it]: > > > > wrapper.java.additional.n=-*javaagent*:%APP_HOME%\*tierext*\*lib*\*plugins > *-instrument-agent.jar=app.launch.properties=%APP_HOME%\*tierext*\*jboss*\ > *conf*\jbLaunch.properties#optier.instrumented.jboss=true#jb.version=5 > > > > I get this message when the app is starting: > > > > --> Wrapper Started as Console > > Java Service Wrapper Standard Edition 3.3.1 > > Copyright (C) 1999-2008 Tanuki Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org > > Licensed to OpTier Ltd. for OpTier BTM Server > > > > Launching a JVM... > > setting system property > :app.launch.properties=C:\App_Server_4-0-0-3008\bin/../..\app\tierext\jboss\conf\jbLaunch.properties > > > > I get an ClassNotFoundException right after that. The app.launch.properties > file was supposed to extend the classpath to cover the class that was not > found. Is there anything I can do to cause the wrapper to parse this > argument correctly? > > > > * * > > *__________________________________________* > > *John Aronson > **Senior Technical Consultant* > > * > *joh...@op... | Office: 303 477 4870 | Cell: 303 332 4802 | > Fax: > > * > *OpTier | West 27th Ave Denver, CO 80211** > > OpTier.com <http://www.optier.com/> | OpTier Blog<http://blog.optier.com/> | > Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/optier> | BTM on Linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=1854916&trk=anet_ug_hm&goback=.prf_en*4US> > > *Take Control of Your Service Availability & Performance with Award > Winning OpTier BTM*** > > *Winner *│2010 Product Innovation Award: End User Monitoring Solution > │Network Products Guide > > *Winner │*2010 Product Innovation Award: Business Transaction Management > Solution │Network Products Guide** > > *Winner │*2009 CTO Summit Innovation Award │Morgan Stanley** > > *Finalist*│2010 IBM Smarter Decision Management Award │IBM Impact Awards** > > *Finalist*│2010 Best Systems Management Solution │SIIA CODiE Awards** > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > |
|
From: John A. <joh...@op...> - 2011-02-07 23:56:47
|
Hi,
I'm trying to add a -javaagent parameter with my wrapper configuration and Im', running into a problem. I think it's because the wrapper class can't parse the javaagent argument correctly.
The arg I added was [note there's multiple '=' in it]:
wrapper.java.additional.n=-javaagent:%APP_HOME%\tierext\lib\plugins-instrument-agent.jar=app.launch.properties=%APP_HOME%\tierext\jboss\conf\jbLaunch.properties#optier.instrumented.jboss=true#jb.version=5
I get this message when the app is starting:
--> Wrapper Started as Console
Java Service Wrapper Standard Edition 3.3.1
Copyright (C) 1999-2008 Tanuki Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org
Licensed to OpTier Ltd. for OpTier BTM Server
Launching a JVM...
setting system property :app.launch.properties=C:\App_Server_4-0-0-3008\bin/../..\app\tierext\jboss\conf\jbLaunch.properties
I get an ClassNotFoundException right after that. The app.launch.properties file was supposed to extend the classpath to cover the class that was not found. Is there anything I can do to cause the wrapper to parse this argument correctly?
__________________________________________
John Aronson
Senior Technical Consultant
joh...@op...<mailto:joh...@op...> | Office: 303 477 4870 | Cell: 303 332 4802 | Fax:
OpTier | West 27th Ave Denver, CO 80211
OpTier.com<http://www.optier.com/> | OpTier Blog<http://blog.optier.com/> | Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/optier> | BTM on Linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=1854916&trk=anet_ug_hm&goback=.prf_en*4US>
Take Control of Your Service Availability & Performance with Award Winning OpTier BTM
Winner │2010 Product Innovation Award: End User Monitoring Solution │Network Products Guide
Winner │2010 Product Innovation Award: Business Transaction Management Solution │Network Products Guide
Winner │2009 CTO Summit Innovation Award │Morgan Stanley
Finalist│2010 IBM Smarter Decision Management Award │IBM Impact Awards
Finalist│2010 Best Systems Management Solution │SIIA CODiE Awards
|
|
From: Christian M. <chr...@ta...> - 2011-01-31 02:50:47
|
Lars, my sincere apologies on the long delay. Leif is currently not available and I haven't realized this conversation is still pending. While your problem sounds its root cause is actually based on your OS. For Standard Editions you could use the start type "DELAY_START" http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-starttype.html This adds a small delay on the service for starting up. So this should give it enough time to start. Another option would be to set a dependency on tcpip wrapper.ntservice.dependency.1=tcpip This tells the Service Manager not to start your service until the tcpip service was started. Which sounds pretty much what you asked for. Looking at the real reason, why the network is established so late, though. I think one of the services running on your machine is probably interfering the network acquisition. Could you try the following on your machine: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/331796/en-us This is a bit of try & error but you eventually should be able to locate the problem. Best Regards and sorry for the delay. Christian On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Lars Schnoor <Lar...@if...> wrote: > Hi Leif > > Can I assume that you lost interest in looking into the problem? > > Lars > > On 31-12-2010 18:04, Leif Mortenson wrote: >> Lars, >> We were able to reproduce this. It seems to be a Windows strangeness. >> Let us look into this and see if there is a way we can work around >> this on startup. I will get back to you shortly. >> >> Japan is out on New Years holiday until the 4th so sorry if this takes >> us a few days to get you an answer. >> >> Cheers, >> Leif >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>> I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am >>> creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. >>> >>> On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>> Lars, >>>> Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Leif >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>> Hi Leif >>>>> >>>>> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >>>>> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >>>>> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >>>>> or something. >>>>> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >>>>> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >>>>> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >>>>> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >>>>> before querying the network card. >>>>> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >>>>> >>>>> Lars >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>>>> Lars, >>>>>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>>>>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>>>>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>>>>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>>>>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>>>>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>>>>> service dependencies with the following property: >>>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>>>>> were looking for. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Leif >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>>>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>>>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>>>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lars >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >> without downtime or disruption >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >> _______________________________________________ >> Wrapper-user mailing list >> Wra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2011-01-29 12:41:22
|
Hi Leif Can I assume that you lost interest in looking into the problem? Lars On 31-12-2010 18:04, Leif Mortenson wrote: > Lars, > We were able to reproduce this. It seems to be a Windows strangeness. > Let us look into this and see if there is a way we can work around > this on startup. I will get back to you shortly. > > Japan is out on New Years holiday until the 4th so sorry if this takes > us a few days to get you an answer. > > Cheers, > Leif > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >> I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am >> creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. >> >> On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>> Lars, >>> Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Leif >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>> Hi Leif >>>> >>>> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >>>> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >>>> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >>>> or something. >>>> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >>>> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >>>> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >>>> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >>>> before querying the network card. >>>> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >>>> >>>> Lars >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>>> Lars, >>>>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>>>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>>>> >>>>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>>>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>>>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>>>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>>>> >>>>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>>>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>>>> >>>>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>>>> service dependencies with the following property: >>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>>>> were looking for. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Leif >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>> >>>>>> Lars > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Christian <chr...@ta...> - 2011-01-21 06:07:21
|
Lars, I'm not exactly sure what you were meaning. I tried starting an application through webstart inside the wrapped java application in the same fashion you were describing (runtime.exec) on my Win7 machine. I was using this sample application: http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/webstart/examples/webstart_ComponentArch_DynamicTreeDemo/src/dynamictree-webstart.jnlp When running in console it was working fine. But I think you were more referring to running the application as Windows Service, am I right? When running as service the web start application was launched also successfully, however because the service was running in session 0, the GUI didn't show. That's why I think you got the impression the application didn't start... We were already thinking about a way on how to overcome this and think we figured out a way to do so. However this is still a little ways off until it will be implemented as it requires launching secondary Wrapper and optionally Java processes in the individual desktop's user space which will interact with each desktop. These child processes will then communicate back to the central Wrapper and or JVM that is always running as a service. Cheers, Christian -----Original Message----- From: Lars Schnoor <Lar...@if...> Reply-to: Lar...@if..., wra...@li... To: wra...@li... Subject: [Wrapper-user] Java Service Wrapper and Java Web Start on Windows 7 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:21:53 +0100 Hi I am using the Java Service Wrapper to start an application on Windows 7. This application uses Java Web Start to start another application. This works fine on Windows XP, but on Windows 7 nothing happens. I was wondering if anyone has experienced something similar and maybe found a solution? The starting of the application using the Java Service Wrapper works fine, but the application that is started with Java Web Start never starts. If I start the service manually using the batch-file the other application started with Java Web Start starts fine. When writing that I start the application with Java Web Start I mean something like this: Process process = runtime.exec("javaws http://"+server+jnlpFile); I think this might have something to do with the session issue, but my application works fine when started directly with the Java Service Wrapper. Any help would be appreciated. Lars ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Wrapper-user mailing list Wra...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2011-01-19 16:22:05
|
Hi
I am using the Java Service Wrapper to start an application on Windows
7. This application uses Java Web Start to start another application.
This works fine on Windows XP, but on Windows 7 nothing happens. I was
wondering if anyone has experienced something similar and maybe found a
solution?
The starting of the application using the Java Service Wrapper works
fine, but the application that is started with Java Web Start never
starts. If I start the service manually using the batch-file the other
application started with Java Web Start starts fine. When writing that I
start the application with Java Web Start I mean something like this:
Process process = runtime.exec("javaws http://"+server+jnlpFile);
I think this might have something to do with the session issue, but my
application works fine when started directly with the Java Service Wrapper.
Any help would be appreciated.
Lars
|
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2011-01-17 02:35:03
|
Scott, Oops, I had not noticed the other replies from Christian. As he explained, this is a different issue in your case caused by the wrapper.dll not being loaded. Please disregard my message. Cheers, Leif On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Leif Mortenson <lei...@ta...> wrote: > Scott, > What is the exact OS and Java version that you are using? I have > heard a couple reports of similar problems with older 32-bit JVMs on a > 64-bit Windows OS, but we have never been able to reproduce it. > Hopefully information from you will help with that. Once I hear back > from you we will try to reproduce it. > > Cheers, > Leif > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: >> I have the following in my wrapper config file: >> wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false >> But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then >> logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: >> INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. >> STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped >> I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this >> situation? >> Thank you, >> Scott |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2011-01-17 02:31:59
|
Scott, What is the exact OS and Java version that you are using? I have heard a couple reports of similar problems with older 32-bit JVMs on a 64-bit Windows OS, but we have never been able to reproduce it. Hopefully information from you will help with that. Once I hear back from you we will try to reproduce it. Cheers, Leif On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: > I have the following in my wrapper config file: > wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false > But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then > logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: > INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. > STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped > I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this > situation? > Thank you, > Scott |
|
From: Christian M. <chr...@ta...> - 2011-01-17 01:37:02
|
Scott, I'm sorry for the delay on this. If you are using a 64-bit JVM, the JVM can't load a 32-bit native library as it is mandatory that the bits of both binaries match. In case you are using the community edition of the wrapper, we would be happy to provide you with a Trial license in order to test your application running on a 64 bit JVM with the Standard/Professional Edition of the Wrapper. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/requestTrial.jsp If you already have a license please try to replace the 32-bit binaries of the wrapper (wrapper.exe & wrapper.dll) with the 64-bit binaries. Another option would be to use a 32 bit JVM. In order to do so, you need to set the property "wrapper.java.command" to point to a valid 32-bit Java executable. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-java-command.html Cheers, Christian On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: > Yes I'm using a 64 bit JVM - java.exe is the executable. > > > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Christian Mueller <chr...@ta...> wrote: > >> Scott, >> >> When a user logs off windows send a signal to all running processes so >> they can respond accordingly. >> The wrapper catched the logoff signal and thus running as service >> ignoring this signal. However, a JVM by it's nature is not expected to >> continue running after a user logoff. Therefore the JVM by default >> start the shutdown (as it is in your case). >> Usually, the native library of the wrapper (wrapper.dll) protects the >> JVM in a way as it is catching this signal from the OS and in case of >> running as service also ignores this making it possible for the JVM to >> keep running even after receiving the logoff signal. >> >> if the jvm you are using is also a 32-bit jvm and loading the 32-bit >> wrapper.dll, the native library should actually catch those signal. >> >> Are you getting a message similar to this when the wrapper starts the JVM? >> >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: WARNING - Unable to load the Wrapper's >> native library because none of the >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: following files: >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper.dll >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: could be located on the following >> java.library.path: >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: C:\.......\lib >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: Please see the documentation for >> the wrapper.java.library.path >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: configuration property. >> jvm 1 | WrapperManager: System signals will not be >> handled correctly. >> >> >> Furthermore what JVM version are you using? We noticed that javaw.exe >> is not always reliably processing the signal to the native library and >> initiating a shutdown of itself when the signal got delivered. >> >> If you think the above mentioned did not apply to you, could you >> please enable debug mode, reproduce the issue and send us the full log >> output of that? >> >> Cheers, >> Christian >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: >>> I have the following in my wrapper config file: >>> wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false >>> But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then >>> logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: >>> INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. >>> STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped >>> I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this >>> situation? >>> Thank you, >>> Scott >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks >>> Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand >>> malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you >>> can protect your company and customers by using code signing. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wrapper-user mailing list >>> Wra...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks >> Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand >> malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you >> can protect your company and customers by using code signing. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >> _______________________________________________ >> Wrapper-user mailing list >> Wra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks > Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand > malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you > can protect your company and customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > |
|
From: Scott V. <van...@gm...> - 2011-01-14 18:01:56
|
Yes I'm using a 64 bit JVM - java.exe is the executable. On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Christian Mueller <chr...@ta...> wrote: > Scott, > > When a user logs off windows send a signal to all running processes so > they can respond accordingly. > The wrapper catched the logoff signal and thus running as service > ignoring this signal. However, a JVM by it's nature is not expected to > continue running after a user logoff. Therefore the JVM by default > start the shutdown (as it is in your case). > Usually, the native library of the wrapper (wrapper.dll) protects the > JVM in a way as it is catching this signal from the OS and in case of > running as service also ignores this making it possible for the JVM to > keep running even after receiving the logoff signal. > > if the jvm you are using is also a 32-bit jvm and loading the 32-bit > wrapper.dll, the native library should actually catch those signal. > > Are you getting a message similar to this when the wrapper starts the JVM? > > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: WARNING - Unable to load the Wrapper's > native library because none of the > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: following files: > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper.dll > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: could be located on the following > java.library.path: > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: C:\.......\lib > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: Please see the documentation for > the wrapper.java.library.path > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: configuration property. > jvm 1 | WrapperManager: System signals will not be > handled correctly. > > > Furthermore what JVM version are you using? We noticed that javaw.exe > is not always reliably processing the signal to the native library and > initiating a shutdown of itself when the signal got delivered. > > If you think the above mentioned did not apply to you, could you > please enable debug mode, reproduce the issue and send us the full log > output of that? > > Cheers, > Christian > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: >> I have the following in my wrapper config file: >> wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false >> But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then >> logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: >> INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. >> STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped >> I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this >> situation? >> Thank you, >> Scott >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks >> Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand >> malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you >> can protect your company and customers by using code signing. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >> _______________________________________________ >> Wrapper-user mailing list >> Wra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks > Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand > malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you > can protect your company and customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Christian M. <chr...@ta...> - 2011-01-14 02:05:37
|
Scott, When a user logs off windows send a signal to all running processes so they can respond accordingly. The wrapper catched the logoff signal and thus running as service ignoring this signal. However, a JVM by it's nature is not expected to continue running after a user logoff. Therefore the JVM by default start the shutdown (as it is in your case). Usually, the native library of the wrapper (wrapper.dll) protects the JVM in a way as it is catching this signal from the OS and in case of running as service also ignores this making it possible for the JVM to keep running even after receiving the logoff signal. if the jvm you are using is also a 32-bit jvm and loading the 32-bit wrapper.dll, the native library should actually catch those signal. Are you getting a message similar to this when the wrapper starts the JVM? jvm 1 | WrapperManager: WARNING - Unable to load the Wrapper's native library because none of the jvm 1 | WrapperManager: following files: jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll jvm 1 | WrapperManager: wrapper.dll jvm 1 | WrapperManager: could be located on the following java.library.path: jvm 1 | WrapperManager: C:\.......\lib jvm 1 | WrapperManager: Please see the documentation for the wrapper.java.library.path jvm 1 | WrapperManager: configuration property. jvm 1 | WrapperManager: System signals will not be handled correctly. Furthermore what JVM version are you using? We noticed that javaw.exe is not always reliably processing the signal to the native library and initiating a shutdown of itself when the signal got delivered. If you think the above mentioned did not apply to you, could you please enable debug mode, reproduce the issue and send us the full log output of that? Cheers, Christian On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Scott Vandezande <van...@gm...> wrote: > I have the following in my wrapper config file: > wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false > But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then > logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: > INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. > STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped > I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this > situation? > Thank you, > Scott > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks > Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand > malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you > can protect your company and customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > |
|
From: Scott V. <van...@gm...> - 2011-01-13 21:53:11
|
I have the following in my wrapper config file: wrapper.ntservice.interactive=false But when someone is logged into the console session (session 0) and then logs off, the JVM exits, with the following in the log file: INFO | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:40 | User logged out. Ignored. STATUS | wrapper | 2011/01/13 12:51:43 | <-- Wrapper Stopped I'm using the 32-bit dll on a 64-bit OS. Is this a known behavior in this situation? Thank you, Scott |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2011-01-11 09:39:25
|
Wendell, At the point that things are getting stuck, the Java side of the Wrapper is attempting to open a socket across the loopback device to the Wrapper. It appears to be freezing at this point. There are no errors shown. I am not familiar with the i2p tool. Is it possible that it is affecting this backend socket? Also, I don't think it is related, but please make sure that the "wrapper", "libwrapper.so", and "wrapper.jar" files are all from the same version of the Wrapper. Operation when the versions do not match is undefined. --- 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version "3.5.7" 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: "3.1.1". 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: not function correctly. This configuration has not been tested 2011/01/08 15:57:00 | WrapperManager: and is not supported. --- Can you provide any more information about the i2p tool? Cheers, Leif On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Wendell MacKenzie <mac...@gm...> wrote: > After registering... > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wendell MacKenzie <mac...@gm...> > Date: Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:30 PM > Subject: Issue with i2p-0.8.2 which uses the taniuk 3.1.1 embedded within > during startup > To: wra...@li... > > > HI: > > I've recently upgraded my OpenSUSE 11.3 laptop to version 2.6.37-31.1 > which is the most recent stable version of their kernel. > > I use the i2p software router previously with no problems. Since the > kernel change, the i2p router will not startup properly. > It appears to launch the i2p jvm, then attempts to ping it (regardless if I > set the wrapper.ping.timeout or interval to 0) and > ultimately kills it and restarts it (5 times). It works normal under prior > kernel versions. > > As the attached debug.log shows, its exhibiting the same behaviour with > the newer version of the wrapper (3.5.7). I can start > the i2p router without the wrapper using the provided runplain.sh, however, > it doesn't provide any of the failover capability. > One not of difference under the 2.6.37 startup is that the launch of the i2p > router using runplain.sh is that is slower to start up > which may account for why the wrapper is having problems pinging it. > > If there is something I can set/try to resolve it I'd sure like to stick > with 2.6.37 as its a much better desktop kernel. > > thx. > W. MacKenzie |
|
From: Wendell M. <mac...@gm...> - 2011-01-08 20:33:23
|
After registering... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wendell MacKenzie <mac...@gm...> Date: Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:30 PM Subject: Issue with i2p-0.8.2 which uses the taniuk 3.1.1 embedded within during startup To: wra...@li... HI: I've recently upgraded my OpenSUSE 11.3 laptop to version 2.6.37-31.1 which is the most recent stable version of their kernel. I use the i2p software router previously with no problems. Since the kernel change, the i2p router will not startup properly. It appears to launch the i2p jvm, then attempts to ping it (regardless if I set the wrapper.ping.timeout or interval to 0) and ultimately kills it and restarts it (5 times). It works normal under prior kernel versions. As the attached debug.log shows, its exhibiting the same behaviour with the newer version of the wrapper (3.5.7). I can start the i2p router without the wrapper using the provided runplain.sh, however, it doesn't provide any of the failover capability. One not of difference under the 2.6.37 startup is that the launch of the i2p router using runplain.sh is that is slower to start up which may account for why the wrapper is having problems pinging it. If there is something I can set/try to resolve it I'd sure like to stick with 2.6.37 as its a much better desktop kernel. thx. W. MacKenzie -- this message was NOT sent from an iPad |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2011-01-06 07:56:37
|
Hi Leif Are there any news on this issue? Lars On 03-01-2011 09:12, Lars Schnoor wrote: > Hi Leif > > That is good news, happy new year! > > Lars > > On 31-12-2010 18:04, Leif Mortenson wrote: >> Lars, >> We were able to reproduce this. It seems to be a Windows strangeness. >> Let us look into this and see if there is a way we can work around >> this on startup. I will get back to you shortly. >> >> Japan is out on New Years holiday until the 4th so sorry if this takes >> us a few days to get you an answer. >> >> Cheers, >> Leif >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>> I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am >>> creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. >>> >>> On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>> Lars, >>>> Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Leif >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>> Hi Leif >>>>> >>>>> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >>>>> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >>>>> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >>>>> or something. >>>>> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >>>>> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >>>>> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >>>>> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >>>>> before querying the network card. >>>>> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >>>>> >>>>> Lars >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>>>> Lars, >>>>>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>>>>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>>>>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>>>>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>>>>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>>>>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>>>>> service dependencies with the following property: >>>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>>>>> were looking for. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Leif >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>>>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>>>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>>>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lars >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers >> to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, >> should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database >> without downtime or disruption >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl >> _______________________________________________ >> Wrapper-user mailing list >> Wra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2011-01-03 08:13:06
|
Hi Leif That is good news, happy new year! Lars On 31-12-2010 18:04, Leif Mortenson wrote: > Lars, > We were able to reproduce this. It seems to be a Windows strangeness. > Let us look into this and see if there is a way we can work around > this on startup. I will get back to you shortly. > > Japan is out on New Years holiday until the 4th so sorry if this takes > us a few days to get you an answer. > > Cheers, > Leif > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >> I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am >> creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. >> >> On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>> Lars, >>> Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Leif >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>> Hi Leif >>>> >>>> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >>>> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >>>> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >>>> or something. >>>> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >>>> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >>>> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >>>> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >>>> before querying the network card. >>>> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >>>> >>>> Lars >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>>> Lars, >>>>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>>>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>>>> >>>>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>>>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>>>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>>>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>>>> >>>>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>>>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>>>> >>>>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>>>> service dependencies with the following property: >>>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>>>> were looking for. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Leif >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>> >>>>>> Lars > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-12-31 17:04:59
|
Lars, We were able to reproduce this. It seems to be a Windows strangeness. Let us look into this and see if there is a way we can work around this on startup. I will get back to you shortly. Japan is out on New Years holiday until the 4th so sorry if this takes us a few days to get you an answer. Cheers, Leif On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Lars Schnoor <Lar...@if...> wrote: > I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am > creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. > > On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: >> Lars, >> Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? >> >> Cheers, >> Leif >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>> Hi Leif >>> >>> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >>> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >>> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >>> or something. >>> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >>> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >>> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >>> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >>> before querying the network card. >>> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >>> >>> Lars >>> >>> >>> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>>> Lars, >>>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>>> >>>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>>> >>>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>>> >>>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>>> service dependencies with the following property: >>>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>>> >>>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>>> were looking for. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Leif >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>> >>>>> Lars |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2010-12-30 23:04:51
|
I am not sure what you mean with direct network connection, I am creating some UDP sockets and a TCP socket. Yes, I am using DHCP. On 30-12-2010 23:51, Leif Mortenson wrote: > Lars, > Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? > > Cheers, > Leif > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >> Hi Leif >> >> It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network >> icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it >> disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address >> or something. >> When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced >> that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the >> machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this >> address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds >> before querying the network card. >> I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. >> >> Lars >> >> >> On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >>> Lars, >>> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >>> networking should come up before any services are started. >>> >>> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >>> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >>> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >>> service. Please see the following for more information. >>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >>> >>> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >>> work reliably if the drive is public however. >>> >>> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >>> service dependencies with the following property: >>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >>> >>> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >>> were looking for. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Leif >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> Lars |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-12-30 22:51:10
|
Lars, Is this is a direct network connection? Using DHCP? Cheers, Leif On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Lars Schnoor <Lar...@if...> wrote: > Hi Leif > > It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network > icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it > disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address > or something. > When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced > that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the > machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this > address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds > before querying the network card. > I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. > > Lars > > > On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: >> Lars, >> What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General >> networking should come up before any services are started. >> >> If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known >> problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a >> feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the >> service. Please see the following for more information. >> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html >> >> Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only >> work reliably if the drive is public however. >> >> If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up >> service dependencies with the following property: >> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html >> >> Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you >> were looking for. >> >> Cheers, >> Leif >> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >>> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >>> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >>> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Lars -- Leif Mortenson Tanuki Software, Ltd. 6-16-7-1001 Nishi-Kasai, Edogawa-ku Tokyo 134-0088 Japan Tel/Fax: +81-3-3878-3211 http://www.tanukisoftware.com lei...@ta... |
|
From: Lars S. <Lar...@if...> - 2010-12-30 22:41:37
|
Hi Leif It is actually the network itself, I often see a circle over the network icon in the taskbar when Windows 7 is started. After a few seconds it disappears, it looks like it needs some more time to get the IP-address or something. When I started to test my application on Windows 7 Beta I experienced that if I query the network as soon as my application is started the machine had a 169.x.x.x address, a standard Windows IP-address, this address was replaced by the correct address if I waited for 20 seconds before querying the network card. I have to admit that I don't know which service I would have to wait for. Lars On 30-12-2010 23:30, Leif Mortenson wrote: > Lars, > What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General > networking should come up before any services are started. > > If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known > problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a > feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the > service. Please see the following for more information. > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html > > Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only > work reliably if the drive is public however. > > If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up > service dependencies with the following property: > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html > > Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you > were looking for. > > Cheers, > Leif > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lar...@if...> wrote: >> Hi >> >> My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper >> uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more >> time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies >> so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Lars > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers > to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, > should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database > without downtime or disruption > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-12-30 22:30:08
|
Lars, What is the network service that you are seeing delays with? General networking should come up before any services are started. If you are trying to make use of a network share, then this is a known problem with the way Windows handles network shares. We have added a feature to make it possible to set up network shares within the service. Please see the following for more information. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-share-general.html Another solution is to reference using UNC format. This will only work reliably if the drive is public however. If you know the service you need to wait for, you can also set up service dependencies with the following property: http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/prop-ntservice-dependency-n.html Please let me know how this works for you, or if this was not what you were looking for. Cheers, Leif On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Lars Schnoor <Lar...@if...> wrote: > Hi > > My Java application that I am starting with the Java Service Wrapper > uses the network. I noticed that on Windows 7 it sometimes takes more > time before the network is ready. Is there a way to define dependencies > so that my application first is started when the network is up and running? > Thanks in advance! > > Lars |
|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-12-30 21:18:00
|
Gabriel, Your suggestion about how to query for the installed state of the Wrapper is a good one. I will talk to our team about implementing that for the next version. We will followup with the updated script when it is done. The 64-bit Windows support is as you mentioned a business decision. I know it is not always popular, but we have had to draw a line someplace to help pay the bills. There have never been any features or platforms pulled from the Community Edition, and every new release sees new features and improvements going into it. We are still actively continuing to support and improve all Editions of the Wrapper, including the Community Editions. Cheers, Leif 2010/12/30 Gabriel . <the...@us...>: > Hi! > > I'm writing to ask a few questions. First of all, I've just read this page: > > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/launch-nix.html#boot > > And i thought it was a good idea to add this feature to the wrapper (I've > been using 3.3.9 and this was added on 3.4.0). I had written my own > installation / uninstallation / test scripts but they only worked under > certain linux distributions. So i thought moving to the official script > would be better as I'm pretty sure it is much more stable and gets to a > wider range of OS. > > However, I just could help noticing it lacks something quite simple that I > (and I think other people out there too) are needing. It is the ability to > test whether the daemon is installed or not. I think this is not hard to > implement as it should be just checking for the existance of certain files. > I think the windows service console launcher has this feature. > > Is there any workaround to test whether the service is installed or not > without installing or removing it using the script you provided in the > previous link? If system rights are not needed, the better :) > > And my last question, probably more commercial than the previous one, is why > is the 64-bit Windows version of the Java Service Wrapper not available for > the Community Edition? I guess it is just a commercial matter (which, of > course, I would understand) but I wanted to make sure it is. If that is the > case, is there any plan to add it to the Community Edition in the future? > > I think that's all. Thanks in advance and happy holidays! |
|
From: Dittmar G. <gr...@if...> - 2010-12-29 22:51:50
|
Dittmar Gross ist wegen Urlaub bis 30-Dez-2010 nicht per eMail zu erreichen. Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Faellen an Telefon +49 (69) 7680 50, Telefax +49 (69) 7680 5333 oder eMail fi...@if... Dittmar Gross is not available via eMail until Dec-30-2010 because of vacation. In urgent cases please contact us directly by Telephone +49 (69) 7680 50, Fax +49 (69) 7680 5333 or eMail fi...@if... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- i:FAO Group Clemensstrasse 9, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Tel +49 (69) 7680-50, Fax +49 (69) 7680-5100, eMail information at ifao.net, www.cytric.info i:FAO Group GmbH Sitz in Frankfurt am Main Eingetragen beim Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRB 73600 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Louis Arnitz, Karin Froese To view the disclaimer text, click here: www.ifao.net/disclaimer |
|
From: Gabriel . <the...@us...> - 2010-12-29 22:37:51
|
Hi! I'm writing to ask a few questions. First of all, I've just read this page: http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/launch-nix.html#boot And i thought it was a good idea to add this feature to the wrapper (I've been using 3.3.9 and this was added on 3.4.0). I had written my own installation / uninstallation / test scripts but they only worked under certain linux distributions. So i thought moving to the official script would be better as I'm pretty sure it is much more stable and gets to a wider range of OS. However, I just could help noticing it lacks something quite simple that I (and I think other people out there too) are needing. It is the ability to test whether the daemon is installed or not. I think this is not hard to implement as it should be just checking for the existance of certain files. I think the windows service console launcher has this feature. Is there any workaround to test whether the service is installed or not without installing or removing it using the script you provided in the previous link? If system rights are not needed, the better :) And my last question, probably more commercial than the previous one, is why is the 64-bit Windows version of the Java Service Wrapper not available for the Community Edition? I guess it is just a commercial matter (which, of course, I would understand) but I wanted to make sure it is. If that is the case, is there any plan to add it to the Community Edition in the future? I think that's all. Thanks in advance and happy holidays! |
|
From: Neeraja K. <nee...@in...> - 2010-12-29 16:40:56
|
I am out of the office until 01/03/2011. Thank you for your e-mail. I am out of the office till Monday, 3rd of January 2011 and your email will not be forwarded. Should the matter be important, please contact following people in my absence. MMC - Sadanand Poorajan Honda - Ajanta Rath Mercedes-Benz - Srinivasa K Korada Note: This is an automated response to your message "[Wrapper-user] Start order of services" sent on 29/12/10 18:31:52. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. |