|
From: Leif M. <le...@ta...> - 2007-10-16 15:54:10
|
Marcin, Not currently. The Wrapper is only capable of monitoring a single JVM at the moment. In addition to be very heavy, controlling the lifecycle and all of the possible failure modes for a second JVM would get complicated in a hurry. What is the problem you are encountering that is requiring this? I may have some ideas for you. Cheers, Leif Marcin Waldowski wrote: > One correction: > > Should be: I have noticed that calling "stop" class is done within the > same JVM as calling *start* class. > > Marcin Waldowski wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> In documentation we can read: >> "The Wrapper works with this kind of application by starting up the >> application, as in the first method, using the "start" class and then >> calling the main method of the "stop" class when it is time for the >> application to be shutdown.". >> >> I have noticed that calling "stop" class is done within the same JVM >> as calling "stop" class. Is it possible to configure wrapper to call >> "stop" class in another JVM? >> >> Regards, Marcin >> |