Re: [Wrapper-user] Windows 64-bit version

[Leif M. <le...@ta...>]

Michael,
    I'll look into VMware for linux versions, but wouldn't I also need 
to have a copy of
64-Windows XP?  Also would need a newer version of Visual Studio.  The 
copy I am
using is fairly old.   This is all possible, but the purchase of all 
that software would need
to have some financial justification.

    Just tried installing VMWare and looked at creating a 64-bit guest 
OS, but get the
message that "64-bit guest operating systems are not supported by this 
host and will
not run.".   All well.

Cheers,
Leif

Michael 'buk' Scherer wrote:
>  Moin ...
>
> A simple workaround for that "I don't have a 64bit-system" is to install
> a VMware-Server, that you get free, and emulate a 64bit system in it.
> You can choose between 32 and 64 bit when you create a VM.
>
> Good luck. ;^)
>
> Michael
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 - 12:46pm, Leif Mortenson wrote:
>
>   
>> Michael,
>>   Yes there is a need for one, but I do not have any hardware to use to create
>> one.
>> 3.2.0 ships with the ability to create such a beast, but the makefiles that are
>> included
>> will not work.  They need to be fixed up by some kind hearted generous soul.
>> If you have a development environment, I would love to make this available for
>> the
>> next release.
>>
>>   You can run the 32-bit version of the Wrapper with a 32-bit JVM on a 64-bit
>> Windows system.  But if you attempt to run the 32-bit Wrapper with a 64-bit
>> JVM,
>> you will get an error that the DLL could not be loaded.   Using the 32-bit
>> Wrapper
>> binary is fine as it is a different process, but the DLL needs have the correct
>> number
>> of bits.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Leif
>>
>> Michael Giroux wrote:
>>     
>>> Is there a need for aWindows 64-bit version of Wrapper?
>>>
>>> Will Windows 64-bit run with the 32-bit dll?
>>>