Re: [Wrapper-user] Problem running the Wrapper on OSX

[Leif M. <le...@ta...>]

Andy,
Thanks for looking into this.  There is a bug open with a fix here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425187&aid=1262323&group_id=39428
Thanks to Alphonse

It is going to need to be fixed for the 3.2.0 release.

Cheers,
Leif

Andy Barnett wrote:

> I downloaded the "wrapper_3.1.2_src.tar.gz" distribution from:
>
>> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php? 
>> group_id=39428&package_id=33658&release_id=273902
>
>
> Then I ran "./build.sh release", and first I got this error:
>
>> compile-java:
>> Compiling 1 source file to /Users/dab/dev/wrapper_3.1.2_src/build/ 
>> classes
>> javac: target release 1.2 conflicts with default source release 1.5
>
>
> Oops... Looks like the Wrapper Java build and Mac OS X's JDK 1.5  
> don't like each other.  So I changed to JDK 1.4 and then got these  
> errors:
>
>> compile-c-unix:
>> Created dir: /Users/dab/dev/wrapper_3.1.2_src/bin
>> if test ! -d .deps; then mkdir .deps; fi
>> gcc -O3 -Wall -pedantic -DUSE_NANOSLEEP -DMACOSX wrapper.c  
>> wrapperinfo.c wrappereventloop.c wrapper_unix.c property.c logger.c  
>> -lcrypto -o ../../bin/wrapper
>> In file included from wrapper.c:367:
>> wrapper.h:268: error: parse error before "u_short"
>> wrapper.h:268: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
>> wrapper.h:269: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of  
>> 'actualPort'
>> wrapper.h:269: error: ISO C forbids data definition with no type or  
>> storage class
>> wrapper.h:346: error: parse error before '}' token
>> wrapper.h:346: warning: ISO C does not allow extra ';' outside of a  
>> function
>> wrapper.c: In function 'wrapperProtocolStartServer':
>> wrapper.c:482: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>> ...
>
>
> Yikes!  I am a Java developer not a C developer, so I'm going to have  
> to wait until the weekend before I can take time to track this down  
> further.
>
> If anyone else has any success compiling Wrapper 3.1.2 on Mac OS  
> 10.4.2 with JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5 please let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> ~Andy