AW: [Wrapper-user] suddenly java.exe consumes 100 percent of free processor time

[Frank F. <fra...@di...>]

Hi Gil
 
>> I've experienced a similar situation when the output from my Java process
printed A LOT of lines of output to STDOUT/STDERR.

>> Are you doing anything like that with your application?

Yep. I wouldn't say it's a LOT but maybe a 200 - 300 short lines in about 24
hours. Is that about the same as in your app?
 
- Frank
 



  _____  

Von: wra...@li...
[mailto:wra...@li...] Im Auftrag von Gil Adam
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 22:44
An: wra...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Wrapper-user] suddenly java.exe consumes 100 percent of free
processor time


I've experienced a similar situation when the output from my Java process
printed A LOT of lines of output to STDOUT/STDERR.

Are you doing anything like that with your application?

-Gil

At 01:28 PM 9/1/2005, you wrote:


Hi all
 
I'm using the Wrapper in a productive environment now for about 10 months.
So far expect for one problem it runs very fine. 
About 3 times within this periode i had a strange effect. On a W2k3 Server
Dual Xeon the java.exe suddenly, after a period of some months without any
problem, consumes constantly 100% of the free processor time. It's not that
dramatic since it only uses free ressources and doesn't block others
processes, but however it's not the way it should work.
The funny thing about it - the Java Application and the Service Wrapper both
seem to continue working without problem or loss of performance. Also memory
usage is stable. 
What i can say, is, that my Java Application seems to be in normal state as
ever, there is no abnormal behaviour, so i guess, it's not the source for
the effect. Also the logs of the service wrapper look quite normal - ping
seems to be working constantly and a service restart using indows Control
Settings/Services works fine.
 
Does anyone ever had a similar situation?
Could it be, that the source of the effect is somewhere in the Java part of
the Service Wrapper? Is there a way to check this?
Any ideas, hints?
 
Thanks for your help
Frank