|
From: Shmulik R. <sh...@vs...> - 2004-03-14 17:30:57
|
On 15 Mar 2004 at 2:16, Leif Mortenson wrote: > I was able to reproduce this using those timeout values. It is > late > here, so it is not > immediately obvious what the problem is. I will take a look at it. thanks. > But for now please go back and remove the three timeout / interval > properties below. What was the original reason that you had wanted to > set them? Setting the timeout to 0 works. But the long ping interval > seems to be causing problems right now... We originally started messing with these properties after we noticed the jvm is restarted by the wrapper. this is probably due to a bug in our application (that causes extensive cpU usage) which is hard to debug when the wrapper restarts the application below our feet. Cheers, Shmul |