|
From: Jennifer K. <jk...@si...> - 2004-03-09 19:12:16
|
yes- the syslog.loglevel one is the one that controls eventlog logging =20= levels and yes, set it to NONE On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:30 AM, john yanlin wrote: > Hi, Jennifer, > > Thanks for the reply! There are three loglevel related properties: > > -- wrapper.console.loglevel > -- wrapper.logfile.loglevel =20 > -- wrapper.syslog.loglevel =20 > > you are talking about the syslog property, right? by disabling it you > mean set it to NONE? > I'll give it a shot. > > Also, I am quite interested in finding out what was happening which > caused the log messed up (content mixed) -- I believe that would be = the > root of the problem which caused the service hung. Hopefully somebody > will be able to point me to some direction. > > Thanks, > John Yanlin > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:23:27 -0800, "Jennifer Kolar" > <jk...@si...> said: >> I too have seen a lot of CPU usage where 100% of CPU is being = consumed >> on a 4 proc box.. however, that is typically tied to a lot of event >> logging ... you might look at what level >> of logging you have set for the event manager.. my CPU usage goes = down >> significantly when I disable that.. Can anyone enlighten on why the >> drastic CPU usage for event logging? >> >> I am also seeing significantly increased java memory usage.. and out =20= >> of >> memory errors where I never saw that with the same code outside of >> the service. So I'd be interested in any response here too. >> >> Jennifer >> On Mar 9, 2004, at 7:51 AM, john yanlin wrote: >> >>> Hi, All, >>> >>> We have been using the wrapper for some win NT services. Recently we >>> occasionally ran into some problem where the services consume almost >>> all >>> (99%, 100%) the CPU resources of a dual-CPU machine. The following =20= >>> is a >>> segment of the wrapper log file: >>> >>> = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 >>> =3D=3D >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> INFO | jvm 1 | 2004/02/18 06:31:25 | Send a packet 103 : ok >>> DEBUG | wrapperp | 2004/02/18 06:31:25 | read a packet 103 : ok >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 06:31:25 | Got ping response from JVM >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 06:31:26 | ServiceControlHandler(4) >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 06:31:26 | =20 >>> SERVICE_CONTROL_INTERROGATE >>> DEBUG | wrapperp | 2004/02/18 06:31:31 | sent 6 bytes >>> INFO | jvm 1 | 2004/02/18 06:31:31 | Received a packet 103 : =20= >>> ping >>> INFO | jvm 1 | 2004/02/18 06:31:31 | Send a packet 103 : ok >>> DEBUG | wrapperp | 2004/02/18 06:31:31 | read a packet 103 : ok >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 06:31:31 | Got ping response from JVM >>> DEBUG | wrapperp | 2004/02/18 06:31:37 | sent 6 bytes >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 06:31:37 | ServiceControlHandler(4) >>> Dvm 1 | 20E0UG4/02 | 18 06wrapper | 31:37 | Received a packet =20= >>> 103 : >>> ping >>> Dvm 1 | 20E0UG4/02 | 18 06wrapper | 31:37 | Received a packet =20= >>> 103 : >>> ping >>> 2004/02/18 06:31:37 | SERVICE_CONTROL_INTERROGATE >>> STATUS | wrapper | 2004/02/18 10:38:00 | --> Wrapper Started as >>> Service >>> DEBUG | wrapperp | 2004/02/18 10:38:00 | server listening on port >>> 17005. >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 10:38:00 | JVM was only running for >>> -322562155 seconds leading to a failed restart count of 1. >>> STATUS | wrapper | 2004/02/18 10:38:00 | Launching a JVM... >>> = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 >>> =3D=3D >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> >>> =46rom which we can see that at 6:31:37 something went wrong. There = are >>> two >>> lines in the log are exactly the same and the contents are sort of >>> mixed. >>> It should be something like: >>> >>> DEBUG | wrapper | 2004/02/18 | 06:31:37 | Received a packet 103 : =20= >>> ping >>> >>> Instead, it came out mixed as: >>> >>> Dvm 1 | 20E0UG4/02 | 18 06wrapper | 31:37 | Received a packet =20= >>> 103 : >>> ping >>> Dvm 1 | 20E0UG4/02 | 18 06wrapper | 31:37 | Received a packet =20= >>> 103 : >>> ping >>> >>> The DEBUG and the date time were mixed. There was a 'B' in the =20 >>> 'DEBUG' >>> missing. the 'J' for 'Jvm 1' was also missing. During that time, the >>> service shown active in the windows service manager panel. But the >>> actual >>> service was hung. >>> >>> It seems that there was something happening inside the wrapper = native >>> part. Have anyone ever got the similar situation like this? Could >>> anyone >>> suggest what was happening here? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> --=20 >>> http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different=85= >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >>> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO = of >>> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >>> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dclick >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wrapper-user mailing list >>> Wra...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dclick >> _______________________________________________ >> Wrapper-user mailing list >> Wra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user > > --=20 > http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different=85 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Wrapper-user mailing list > Wra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user |