|
From: Palmer, D. <Dav...@ph...> - 2003-03-31 19:04:35
|
> > Okay... this is pretty strange... at least to me anyway. > Basically what I > have is a server "wrapper" class which starts the RMI registry, then > instantiates a Implementation class (the thing that extends > UnicastRemoteObject and implements the remote interface). please disregard my post here. this was my bad, damn monday mornings! I was trying to rebind my remote object to a different port than what i set as my rmi registry port! Of course i'll get connection refused!!! sorry folks ./dave "The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any harmful and malicious code or defects when sent. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective and remedial action regarding the code or such defects. The sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments." |