Re: [Wrapper-user] wrapper as daemon on un*x

[Rajiv S. <wo...@ya...>]

Hi Leif,
    I apologize for the delayed response.. I will be testing wrapper on solaris
today, and will get back to you in the evening. Can't thank you enough for the
quick response!

Rajiv

--- Leif Mortenson <le...@ta...> wrote:
> Rajiv, Pritchard,
>     Ok, I think I got both the wrapper.daemonize and wrapper.pidfile 
> properties along with
> docs and new versions of the scripts all implemented.   Could you guys 
> please give these
> fixes a try and make sure you agree with the changes.  Also let me know 
> if you have any
> problems/comments with the way this was implemented in the sh/bash 
> template scripts.
> 
>     I decided not to make the wrapper.daemonize property disable output 
> as it did in your
> patch.  This is easy to do by using the wrapper.console.loglevel=NONE 
> property.  This
> way the user will have more control.
> 
>     You can get the source by doing an anonymous checkout from CVS:
> http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=39428
> 
>     Or, if you rather, I put up a source binary at the following URL. 
>  I'll leave it up for a
> few days:
> http://www.tanukisoftware.com/wrapper_2.3.0b_src_with_doc_src.tar.gz
> 
>     I'm hoping to get a new release out soon.
> 
> Cheers,
> Leif
> 
> 
> Rajiv Subrahmanyam wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >   From what i see, when bash exits, it re-assigns all backgrounded
> processes
> >as children of init. The behaviour of sh, (and maybe all other pre-bash
> shells)
> >is to send SIGHUP to all its children, backgrounded or not.. Also, this
> seems
> >to happen only on solaris (aix, maybe), since on (most) linuxii, sh is
> merely a
> >symlink to bash.
> >   Lief, I'm able to see the java processes' output in the log file using
> >daemon mode. I think the stdout and stderr of the java process are being
> >re-assigned.. 
> >I have another question: All the code regarding writing PID files is
> surrounded
> >by #ifdef SOLARIS... I would like to use the PID file mechanism on linux
> too,
> >instead of pidof (Just because i want to use the same bourne sh script with
> >minimum differences between solaris and linux implementations). Is it
> possible
> >to open up that code for both solaris and linux? Thanks!
> >
> >Regards,
> >Rajiv
> >
> >--- "Pritchard, Sean" <SP1...@te...> wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>I am using Solaris 9 and did an explicit test to confirm I was not seeing
> >>Rajiv's reported behavior yesterday.  I am not seeing it, but then again, I
> >>am using bash as my shell and his note said it only occurs when you use sh
> >>as your shell.
> >>
> >>Sean
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Leif Mortenson [mailto:le...@ta...]
> >>Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:20 PM
> >>To: wra...@li...
> >>Subject: Re: [Wrapper-user] wrapper as daemon on un*x
> >>
> >>
> >>Rajiv,
> >>Thanks for this patch. But I have some questions.
> >>
> >>I have not had access to a Solaris machine for a while so I can not
> >>verify the
> >>behavior now. On Linux, it appears to work if I telnet to the box, start
> >>an app
> >>and then log off. The wrapper process will still be running when I come
> >>back at
> >>a later date. Maybe this is just a Solaris issue? I am surprised that no
> >>other
> >>users have ever said anything about this before.
> >>
> >>Any solaris users out there have any comments on this?
> >>
> >>I have no problem adding this feature. Especially since it is all
> >>implemented. :-)
> >>I am just curious as to why others have not run into this. Or if they
> >>have, how
> >>they have been working around it.
> >>
> >>Also a question. With this patch. Are you still able to capture stdout
> >>and stderr
> >>output from the Java process and log them to the file. It looks like
> wrapper
> >>console output is being thrown away. Which is fine for a daemon process.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Leif
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> >http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will
> >allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your 
> >clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. 
> >Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wrapper-user mailing list
> >Wra...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com