Re: [Wrapper-user] Correct wrapper binary in cygwin environment?

[Jeff N. <je...@ci...>]

Thanks! I'm using the community edition

On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Alexandre Klein <
ale...@ta...> wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> We are currently looking at this and we will get back at you as soon as
> possible.
>
> In the meantime, which version of the Wrapper do you attend to use ?
> Community or Standard or Professional ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alexandre Klein
> Tanuki Software, Ltd.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Jeff Nelson <je...@ci...<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','je...@ci...');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Is there support for using the wrapper in a cygwin environment on
>> Windows? If so, what is the proper binary to use, the linux or windows one?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to
>> Perforce.
>> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
>> Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and
>> the
>> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wrapper-user mailing list
>> Wra...@li...<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Wra...@li...');>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wrapper-user
>>
>>
>

-- 
Sent from my iPhone