|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-06-18 10:37:21
|
Juan, The Wrapper is able to load the file as wrapper.dll OR wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll. It does this so that it can have the native library for multiple platforms in the same directly. Users who want to deploy this way make use of the "delta pack" release of the Wrapper. In your case it is working correctly. I am trying to figure out what could be causing this for you. If you could send me a simple class that reproduces this it would be a big help in getting this resolved for you promptly. Thanks in advance, Leif On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Juan Sanchez <jsa...@pu...> wrote: > Leif, I noticed that the DLL was wrong positioned, I fixed it... but > I have noticed in the wrapper.log that it can not found the file > wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll , but I have never gotten it ... I only > have the wrapper.dll file. I did the process once again but everything > still with the same mistakes. If I close the GUI , the services stop. > When I downloaded the wrapper packet I didn´t have the > wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll file. > > thks > Juan > > Leif Mortenson escribió: >> Juan, >> Thank you for the log. It shows that there are a few non-daemon >> threads still running so that is not why the JVM is exiting. Since >> you are also not calling System.exit, then the most likely cause is a >> an external source shutting down the JVM. Any Wrapper induced >> shutdown would result in a log entry being made, so it must be coming >> directly to the JVM. >> >> One of the jobs of the wrapper.dll is to protect the JVM against such >> signals and log them when they take place. The Wrapper is currently >> looking in the following directory for the wrapper.dll. The error >> messages are saying that it does not exist. If the file were found, >> but simply corrupted then the error message would be different: >> C:\Documents and Settings\cooljsh\Mis >> documentos\chamba\cachuelo2\DEPLOY\MonitorLanCenter\lib >> >> Is your application something that we could try out locally? Sent off >> list of course. If not, would it be easy to create a simple class to >> reproduce what you are seeing? >> >> Cheers, >> Leif |