|
From: Leif M. <lei...@ta...> - 2010-04-15 07:19:13
|
Tomer, Historical Java Service Wrapper releases can be downloaded from the following directory. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/downloads We supported 64-bit Sparc going back farther, but the first 64-bit x86 release we did was version 3.3.0. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/downloads/3.3.0/ In order for all of the Wrapper's functionally to be operational, it is necessary that the "bits" of the Wrapper match the "bits" of the JVM. The Wrapper process itself does not matter so much, but the JVM needs to load in a native JNI library, libwrapper.so. If the "bits" do not match that of the JVM process, then the JVM will not be able to load it. All of the signal handling and several other features require that the native library be present. The Wrapper will work without the native library, but the JVM process will not be protected as well. The Wrapper's pinging will work fine as that is handled in the wrapper.jar, within Java code. There have been a lot of other changes, fixes, and improvements going into the Wrapper over the years since 3.1.2 was released. In general, we always suggest making use of the latest version. 3.4.0 has proved to be very stable to date. Hope this helps. Cheers, Leif On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Tomer B <tom...@gm...> wrote: > Does release 3.1.2 supports solaris 64 x86 if not which version started its > support? > Can I start the java service wrapper in solaris 32 x86 bit and let it run my > jvm which will be in solaris x86 64 bit? will it work (including > communication - pings from wrapper to my jvm, hooks from wrapper to my app > etc). > > I saw this in release notes: > > 3.3.1 > > Fix a problem where the 64-bit Solaris x86 version was unable to load its > JNI library. Bug #1992039. > > 3.3.0 > > Fix an occasional crash with 64-bit UNIX caused by a native synchronization > problem when system signals are trapped. Bug #1614010. > is this also related to solaris 64-bit? > > 3.2.0 > > Add support for Linux 64-bit PPC and Solaris 32-bit x86 versions. > > Thanks |