Re: [Workrave-user] FYI- Another minor issue with long idle times

[Rob C. <ro...@kr...>]

William McKee <wi...@kn...> writes:

> I think it would make most sense for activity-insensitive timers to stop
> only after their break, not other timer-triggered breaks. Thus for a
> micropause break, a restbreak timer that was activity-insensitive would
> continue timing until the restbreak occurred and would not restart until
> activity was seen.

Ok. This is how it is implemented right now.

> This solution would allow me to have an activity-insensitive micropause
> with an activity-sensitive restbreak (assuming those options are
> available) which would achieve the desire behavior as I outlined
> earlier.

Yes, this is possible. Each timer can be set to activity sensitive or
activity insensitive.

Groetjes,
  Rob
  
-- 
Rob Caelers -- ro...@kr...
"If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance
that we can solve them." -- Isaac Asimov