Re: [Wonder-disc] ERCalendar framework

[Johan C. <jo...@oo...>]

Hi Max & Anjo,

I'm somewhat confused now. Although I do understand your discussion 
about Nonlocalized, I'm just not sure about what I should do in 
ERCalendar.

To include Nonlocalized.lproj, or not to include Nonlocalized.lproj, 
that is the question.

I believe that you both want me to have a Nonlocalized.lproj 
directory, but I'm not certain? It's no big deal to me, I can change 
back and forth in seconds.

Johan

Max Muller (10.20 -0800 2002-10-28) skrev:
>That's fine with me, but knowing now that Nonlocalized.lproj is 
>somewhat Wonder specific we should think about in the future making 
>Nonlocalized 'deprecated'. For ERCalendar, fine with me to put 
>everything in Nonlocalized.lproj I just thought if it didn't need to 
>be in Nonlocalized.lproj then we wouldn't need to put it there.

Anjo Krank (20.08 +0100 2002-10-28) skrev:
>I still think that PBX should work according to the docs, not the 
>other way round. Also, it really made sense to me. However I think 
>until PBX is not really able to handle localized files correctly, we 
>should stay in the same structure for the existing frameworks. *If* 
>and when PBX is finally fixed - and I won't hold my breath - we can 
>think about converting the stuff back again. We could rework the 
>PBXUtil to move things one level higher when its name is 
>"Nonlocalized" or something.
>
>So Johan, feel free to check in like you planned. Sorry for the delay.