From: Mike S. <ms...@md...> - 2007-02-27 17:03:52
|
WOOGNL has this little assuming class named D2WOgnlAssignment. It's like 10 lines of code, but it means that anyone who uses WOOGNL is also loading D2W frameworks. Does anyone have a problem if this class moves over to ERD2W? The problem with this is twofold: 1) if you used WOOGNL + D2W, but not ERD2W, you now would need ERD2W (does anyone even DO D2W w/o ERD2W?), 2) ERD2W either needs to depend on WOOGNL or it needs to use reflection for the one method call in D2WOgnlAssignment. I'm all for reflection for that one call and if you need to use it, you include both frameworks yourself. So the class would not change -- it would still be ognl.webobjects.D2WOgnlAssignment, but it would just shift over to ERD2W framework and would switch to use reflection for the call to WOOgnl.factory().getValue(..). Start the or-forever-hold-your-peace countdown .... now. ms |