From: <ste...@se...> - 2007-01-26 21:16:19
|
Hello, I noticed the same bug a week ago, and fixed it in my build, though, =20 after I have read your patch, I see that I missed a case ;-) I'll include your patch to the next 1.3 release that I'm preparing. Merci, St=E9phane On Jan 26, 2007, at 12:08 AM, S=E9bastien Sahuc wrote: > Hey, > > In our group, we noticed that the current ruleModeler would save =20 > rules in a non-deterministic order hence preventing proper merge, =20 > especially with big rule file (ours is over 1.5MB). So Dave Scheck, =20= > from our team, came up with the attached fix that I'd like the =20 > wonder list to review before I commit it to trunk. We've been using =20= > this patch for now over a month and didn't have any single issue. > > Thanks, > > Sebastien > > <RuleModeler_patch.txt> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to =20 > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?=20 > page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDEVDEV____________________________= ____=20 > _______________ > Wonder-disc mailing list > Won...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wonder-disc |