Re: [WOLK-devel] WOLK Status
Brought to you by:
hight0wer
From: KORN A. <kor...@ch...> - 2005-05-02 08:29:20
|
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:48:55AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > I haven't heard much going on lately with WOLK. Is there still work > > being done on it, or where is the focus lately? Just curious since I > > almost forgot about this list and it reminded me! > > Yep, work is beeing done, both 2.4-WOLK and 2.6-WOLK where 2.4 not as fast as > 2.6. I don't release any 2.6-WOLK because, as I said so much times in the > past, there are no help offerings, so I do this private just for me and some > good friends. Um. I think you may not be taking the best approach here. You basically took your ball and went home (the fact that nobody on this list comes close to you as a kernel hacker must have offended you a great deal :). What harm would it do to release what you come up with? You still are under no obligation to support it in any way... It's what I do with my kernel hacks (not that they amount to much). If someone finds them useful, so much the better - we've managed to reduce duplication of effort, which is partly what open source is about. It wouldn't occur to me to pout and sulk just because I'm the only one who could create that particular patch (either because I'm the only one who thought it was worth doing or the only one who had the time or the only one who knew how - in my case, the latter is the least likely, but what does it matter?). Oh well. I just hope you'll get over it. Andras -- Andras Korn <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu> <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/> QOTD: A little bit of censorship is like being a little bit pregnant. |