Re: [WOLK-devel] Wolk for 2.4.21

[KORN A. <kor...@ch...>]

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:08:35PM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:

> > Now, any useful input on how to manage this would be welcome. I'm not sure
> > if providing incremental patches for all features is very important; what
>  I would very much like the infremental patches, this makes so much easier
> to work with kernel, you can relatively easily throw away the code you
> don't like. This way one can build relatively stable kernel based on WOLK.
> ( I used to do that when patchests were available, WOLK was running on my
> desktop, WOLK-lite running on servers ).

OK, should I provide incremental patches for any of the features added so
far? None of them should break anything when they're not enabled...

(see http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/kernel/ for current status.)

Andrew

-- 
          Andrew Korn (Korn Andras) <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu>
           Finger korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu for pgp key. QOTD:
                    Save the whales... harpoon a rap group.