Re: [WOLK-devel] Wolk for 2.4.21

[Dariush P. <ey...@fo...>]

> Now, any useful input on how to manage this would be welcome. I'm not sure
> if providing incremental patches for all features is very important; what
 I would very much like the infremental patches, this makes so much easier
to work with kernel, you can relatively easily throw away the code you
don't like. This way one can build relatively stable kernel based on WOLK.
( I used to do that when patchests were available, WOLK was running on my
desktop, WOLK-lite running on servers ).

-- 
Dariush Pietrzak,
She swore and she cursed, that she never would deceive me
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9