Re: [Widelands-public] Naming of save dir

[Holger R. <Hol...@gm...>]

Hi,

ssave is attic IMHO. i prefer the possibility to continue a netgame  
with the computer as second player. Is it worth to rename it?

Holger

Am 14.11.2008 um 15:55 schrieb Peter Schwanemann:

> Erik skrev:
>>>> From log message of revision 720: Games are now saved in ssave
>> (single-player saves)
>>
>> So the first 's' is for "single-player".
> Thank you Erik,
>
> that point is really interesting - so do we really want to seperate  
> between multi and dingleplayer savegames? Until now all saved games  
> are saved to ssave and the following two points are positive aspects  
> of this saving pattern:
> 1) Generally it's possible to load a multiplayer game in  
> singleplayer and the other way around - it's up to the player what  
> savegame they select...
> 2) From my point of view: if you had a nice netgame, but canceled  
> it, after the first player lost (or similiar) it can be quite nice  
> to play the game until "the end" as singleplayer.
>
> On the other hand the obvious advantage of seperating the savegames  
> is, that the player don't need to distinguish between single and  
> multiplayer savegames as only the fitting ones would be shown in the  
> list.
>
> Any comments? A good solution?
> -- 
> Sensationsangebot nur bis 30.11: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
> für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/? 
> ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Widelands-public mailing list
> Wid...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/widelands-public