|
From: Andreas G. <ag...@on...> - 2003-08-27 21:50:20
|
On Mittwoch, August 27, 2003, at 04:31 Uhr, Miro Jurisic wrote: > At 4:27 PM +0200 8/27/03, Andreas Grosam wrote: >> On Mittwoch, August 27, 2003, at 03:48 Uhr, Miro Jurisic wrote: >> >>>> There is currently no implementation for stack crawling for Mach-O. >>>> >>>> I'll make an attempt. Although, I won't promise anything ;) >>> >>> For totally selfish reasons I have a very strong preference for >>> getting things to build under Mach-O even if they are incomplete. >>> That said, Darwin should have the code for that, and the easiest >>> approach IMO is to ask on the Darwin list where it might be. >>> >> My test code is running now. Slow, but it works. (Could be improved, >> but may be this is sufficient) >> However, I'm searching for a function unmangling the symbols for >> better reading. >> Is there something for Apple and MW compiler available? > > If there are, they would be in Darwin. If there aren't, they follow > the C++ ABI from <http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/>, but they are > not perfectly in line with the spec. After some search, eventually I found good sources in the gdb sources. It's a little bit more stuff than I supposed to .. just for demangling. Well, think I need to skip everything not needed. I also noticed your mails in Google/Groups with MWRon and others regarding the C++ ABI in Metrowerks. Hope, Metrowerks will fix the errors you mentioned in CW9. It's to late now (23.50 Uhr), so I will proceed tomorrow. Andreas > > meeroh > -- > > <http://web.meeroh.org/> | KB1FMP > > A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Whisper2-develop mailing list > Whi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/whisper2-develop > |