webwork-user Mailing List for WebWork (Page 9)
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
Menu
▾
▴
webwork-user — WebWork users mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(194) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(133) |
Mar
(193) |
Apr
(114) |
May
(141) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(334) |
Aug
(418) |
Sep
(329) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(296) |
Dec
(122) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(123) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(115) |
Apr
(149) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-23 13:15:15
|
This should be fixed with the latest CVS. -Matt On Thu, 23 May 2002, ma...@sm... wrote > > I've downloaded Resin and am seeing the error. I'll get > this fixed. Thanks Mike. > > On Thu, 23 May 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote > > > > > I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment - > like 68 of > > PropertyTag.java. > > > > Investigating (and trying to patch) now - but just > thought I'd ask. Surely > > someone is using WW on Resin out there? ;) > > > > Cheers, > > Mike > > > > Mike Cannon-Brookes > > mi...@at... > > > > ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > Brilliant Software - > http://www.atlassian.com/software > > > Legendary Services - > http://www.atlassian.com/support > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application > Developer's Conference > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Webwork-user mailing list > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-23 12:56:04
|
I've downloaded Resin and am seeing the error. I'll get this fixed. Thanks Mike. On Thu, 23 May 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote > > I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment - like 68 of > PropertyTag.java. > > Investigating (and trying to patch) now - but just thought I'd ask. Surely > someone is using WW on Resin out there? ;) > > Cheers, > Mike > > Mike Cannon-Brookes > mi...@at... > > ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software > > Legendary Services - http://www.atlassian.com/support > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Harvey K. <ha...@ka...> - 2002-05-23 11:51:09
|
I've got couple pages with corresponding actions. Made them Prepare and Session Aware to marshal my multi-page wizard data to/from session scope. That works fine. Situation --------- - I type into form on page 1 and click next/submit. - On page 2 I would like to go back to page 1. - When I go back to page 1 can I get WW to pre-fill the form with the data that was orginally typed in? On my second page I have a BACK button which just redirects to page 1 like so: <input class="button1" type=button value="Back" onclick="window.document.URL='page1.jsp'"> Is there any way that I could invoke an action for the page 1 so that it pre-fills form data and displays the page to the user? The only thing I have seen in the documentation for Action class API states the following with regard to the action type of INPUT: "The action execution require more input in order to succeed. This result is typically used if a form handling action has been executed so as to provide defaults for a form. The form associated with the handler should be shown to the end user. This result is also used if the given input parameters are invalid, meaning the user should try providing input again." Help! Thanks. |
|
From: Harvey K. <ha...@ka...> - 2002-05-23 10:00:45
|
Sorry, ignore my previous post - I was missing a get method for my property, doh! Having said that, it would be nice to access public properties that do not have related get methods... "Harvey Kandola" <ha...@ka...> wrote in message news:acids0$d06$1...@ma...... > > I have an object in session scope (xyz) and would like to retrieve a value > (blah) from this object: > > <webwork:property value="@xyz/blah"/> > > Can't get it to work...documentation suggests it is possible... > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm |
|
From: Harvey K. <ha...@ka...> - 2002-05-23 09:48:35
|
I have an object in session scope (xyz) and would like to retrieve a value (blah) from this object: <webwork:property value="@xyz/blah"/> Can't get it to work...documentation suggests it is possible... |
|
From: Hans S. <hst...@bw...> - 2002-05-23 07:14:03
|
So that was it, I'm happy that I understood it right, I only had to look a bit further. Thanks for the answer, Hans On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:19:03PM +0000, Hans Steinraht wrote: > Hi, > > I'm playing a bit with webwork and started going through the examples to see > how it works. > > I came to this question, what is meant by the following action: > <A href="tests/exprformtest!default.action"> > > I do understand that the action: "exprformtest.action" will be mapped to the > "doExecute()" method in "ExprFormTest.java", and that I could make a method > "doFoo()" in "ExprFormTest.java" that I can use as "tests/exprformtest!foo.action". > > But what is meant with "exprformtest!default.action" (I would expect a method > "doDefault()" in ExprFormTest but I asume that I'm wrong). > > Can anyone explain this to me. > > thanks, > Hans > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-05-23 04:38:56
|
I get a lot of NullPointerExceptions at the moment - like 68 of PropertyTag.java. Investigating (and trying to patch) now - but just thought I'd ask. Surely someone is using WW on Resin out there? ;) Cheers, Mike Mike Cannon-Brookes mi...@at... ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner -------------------------------------------------------- > Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software > Legendary Services - http://www.atlassian.com/support |
|
From: John C. <car...@ll...> - 2002-05-22 22:01:29
|
At 08:15 AM 5/22/2002 -0500, Dave Bryson wrote: >On Tuesday 21 May 2002 06:33 pm, you wrote: > > So I've been thinking, instead of programming, and I came up with the > > following idea: What if I use my WebWork ActionSupport beans in a message > > queuing system? The views.properties & a dispatcher would direct the > > messages between various ActionSupport beans. This is probably treading on > > the area of JMS and message driven > > beans, but I was wondering what the rest of you thought. It seems like it > > could do things like > > handle error conditions well, multicast with a comma separated list of > > recipients, and select > > between various output queues using views.properties. How would > > persistence be implemented? > >What are you trying to accomplish? Do you want the Actions to serve as a >bunch of workers that communicate via the message queue? My current task is to input a list of drawing numbers, get the highest revision of the drawings from an Oracle DBMS, fatten the lines on the drawing, convert the drawing to a multipage PDF, and write the PDFs to a directory in preparation for burning to CD or DVD. I've done this task 3 times already, using JMS, Oracle AQ, and XML with directories. In order to make the system reconfigurable, I've had to do things like submit the pipeline that drawings go through in advance, and then for each process, tell it which queue to pull from. It would be VERY nice if I could put all that decision making into a views.properties file or database table, to make the system reconfigurable (say we wanted to skip the fatten step, or the fatten step gets incorporated into the PDF conversion). >Have you looked at Jini and JavaSpaces? I think I looked at JavaSpaces--what persistence technology do they use? We only have a uniprocessor machine at this point, so I'm not sure how useful creating a lot of worker bees on a queue would be. Also, I haven't seen anything as reconfigurable as WebWork OOTB, but maybe I haven't looked hard enough. John |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-22 18:04:08
|
- action tag - you can access the value stack directly - hmmm. On Wed, 22 May 2002, "Francisco Hernandez" wrote > > how many different ways of retrieving data from an action are there? > > I know that i could use in my actions getFoo() and just use webwork's > property jsp tag to retrieve that value, but what other ways are available > to webwork/jsp? (besides using custom tags and jsp scriptlets..) > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Francisco H. <fhe...@fh...> - 2002-05-22 16:58:48
|
how many different ways of retrieving data from an action are there? I know that i could use in my actions getFoo() and just use webwork's property jsp tag to retrieve that value, but what other ways are available to webwork/jsp? (besides using custom tags and jsp scriptlets..) |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-22 16:16:50
|
Do you have an example I can look at? On Wed, 22 May 2002, "Baldree, Matthew" wrote > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bady Ludovic" <lud...@pr...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:08 AM > Subject: [Webwork-user] tabbedPane : (get)selectedUrl > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm using the tabbedpane Tag : <webwork:tabbedpane id="tp1" > > contentName="'tabs1'" tabAlign="'RIGHT'"/> > > with web logic 6.1 SP2, WebWork 1.0.2, JDK 1.3.1_02. > > > > It works fine with action and Java class associated in order to do the > > filling of the tabbedpane. > > But i meet a a problem with the tag inside the file tabbepane.jsp(standard > > template), at the end : > > > > <webwork:include value="selectedUrl"/>, this is a fonction call inside the > > class TabbedPaneTag.getSelectedUrl() which > > extract the value from the MAP in function of the current index of the > > TabbedPane. > > Each time the tag doesn't appear after building of the page, so we don't > get > > the corresponding code asssociated to the > > index. > > > > Cordially, > > > > Ludovic. > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > > _______________________________________________ > > Webwork-user mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > > > |
|
From: Dave B. <db...@in...> - 2002-05-22 13:24:41
|
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 06:33 pm, you wrote: > So I've been thinking, instead of programming, and I came up with the > following idea: What if I use my WebWork ActionSupport beans in a message > queuing system? The views.properties & a dispatcher would direct the > messages between various ActionSupport beans. This is probably treading on > the area of JMS and message driven > beans, but I was wondering what the rest of you thought. It seems like it > could do things like > handle error conditions well, multicast with a comma separated list of > recipients, and select > between various output queues using views.properties. How would > persistence be implemented? What are you trying to accomplish? Do you want the Actions to serve as a bunch of workers that communicate via the message queue? Have you looked at Jini and JavaSpaces? -- Dave Bryson |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-22 13:19:40
|
see below On Wed, 22 May 2002, Hans Steinraht wrote > > Hi, > > I'm playing a bit with webwork and started going through the examples to see > how it works. > > I came to this question, what is meant by the following action: > <A href="tests/exprformtest!default.action"> > > I do understand that the action: "exprformtest.action" will be mapped to the > "doExecute()" method in "ExprFormTest.java", and that I could make a method > "doFoo()" in "ExprFormTest.java" that I can use as "tests/exprformtest!foo.action". > > But what is meant with "exprformtest!default.action" (I would expect a method > "doDefault()" in ExprFormTest but I asume that I'm wrong). you are correct in expecting doDefault(). if you look at its super class you will find this method. > > Can anyone explain this to me. > > thanks, > Hans > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Dave B. <db...@in...> - 2002-05-22 13:15:42
|
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 08:19 am, you wrote: > Hi, > > I'm playing a bit with webwork and started going through the examples to > see how it works. > > I came to this question, what is meant by the following action: > <A href="tests/exprformtest!default.action"> > > I do understand that the action: "exprformtest.action" will be mapped to > the "doExecute()" method in "ExprFormTest.java", and that I could make a > method "doFoo()" in "ExprFormTest.java" that I can use as > "tests/exprformtest!foo.action". > > But what is meant with "exprformtest!default.action" (I would expect a > method "doDefault()" in ExprFormTest but I asume that I'm wrong). > No you are right. There is a doDefault() method in ActionSupport that returns INPUT. See ActionSupport.java -- Dave Bryson |
|
From: Hans S. <hst...@bw...> - 2002-05-22 11:09:24
|
Hi, I'm playing a bit with webwork and started going through the examples to see how it works. I came to this question, what is meant by the following action: <A href="tests/exprformtest!default.action"> I do understand that the action: "exprformtest.action" will be mapped to the "doExecute()" method in "ExprFormTest.java", and that I could make a method "doFoo()" in "ExprFormTest.java" that I can use as "tests/exprformtest!foo.action". But what is meant with "exprformtest!default.action" (I would expect a method "doDefault()" in ExprFormTest but I asume that I'm wrong). Can anyone explain this to me. thanks, Hans |
|
From: Tom Q. <qu...@su...> - 2002-05-22 06:59:46
|
Hallo,
we found two small bugs in webwork (and more important, two fixes):
- in class NodeWalker all attributes of the XML are delete:
contentHandler.startElement("", attributeName, "", EMPTY_ATTRS);
In my opinion the right way to do this is:
contentHandler.startElement("", attributeName, "", saxAttributes);
- In class ValueStack the program rely on a final null-value in the
segments array:
// always have the next segment ready to go
segment = segments[segmentIdx++];
// if we don't need to search through the stack then return the
value
// this is very unlikely to happen, but we have account for it
anyway
if (segment == null)
return value;
But the final null-value is not allways there. In Query the array is only
extended when there is no more space for a new value:
private void add(QuerySegment qs) {
if (segmentsIdx == segments.length) {
QuerySegment[] resize = new QuerySegment[segments.length + 5];
System.arraycopy(segments, 0, resize, 0, segments.length);
segments = resize;
}
segments[segmentsIdx++] = qs;
}
The easiest solution is to extend the array in advance:
if (segmentsIdx == segments.length - 1) { ...
It would be very helpful if someone could commit those changes to the CVS.
Regards,
Tom
|
|
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-21 03:55:16
|
I fixed the call order to super() in the latest CVS as well as the branch. See if this fixes the problem. If you are correct and Orion doesn't call release(), then we will need to place the release logic in the doEndTag() as well. Will you check on this and let me know? -Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heng Sin Low" <low...@ya...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:49 PM Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Webwork/Orion > Yes, it seems like a bug to me. In the > ComponentTag.release method, getStack().popValue() was > called after super.release() which would set the stack > to null and the container would propably set the > pageContext to null too. I think the push and pop > value call should be put in a try finally block in the > doEndTag() method instead. I suspect there is a > problem with the PropertyTag too as Orion doesn't seem > to call the release method before reusing a tag > instance ( this would break the escape null checking > logic ). > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > |
|
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-21 03:07:52
|
Hmm. We might need the logic in *both* places. WebLogic needs logic in release() which is more spec compliant in that release is called to set state. I'm not intimate with Orion but it sounds like you would be correct if it doesn't call release(). I will fix the release order calls to super(). Thx. -Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heng Sin Low" <low...@ya...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:49 PM Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Webwork/Orion > Yes, it seems like a bug to me. In the > ComponentTag.release method, getStack().popValue() was > called after super.release() which would set the stack > to null and the container would propably set the > pageContext to null too. I think the push and pop > value call should be put in a try finally block in the > doEndTag() method instead. I suspect there is a > problem with the PropertyTag too as Orion doesn't seem > to call the release method before reusing a tag > instance ( this would break the escape null checking > logic ). > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > |
|
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-21 02:59:50
|
Good points. I'll take a look at this. -Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heng Sin Low" <low...@ya...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:10 PM Subject: RE:Re: FW: [Webwork-user] multipart support > 1. It might be usefull if there is support for > uploading to memory too. It can improve performance at > the expense of more memory usage ( usefull when u know > the size is small ). > > 2. maxSize tends to be action specific, I think a > mechanism that allow the action to override the > maxSize should be usefull here. > > Just my 2cent. > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > |
|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-05-21 02:43:50
|
1.0.2.2 has the same JSP compilation engine as Orion 1.5.3 - so it should work fine. I didn't see the previous mail so I'm not exactly familiar with the problem - apologies. The flag is a command line flag - which can also be set in orion.properties. See http://kb.atlassian.com/content/atlassian/howto/orionproperties.jsp Cheers, Mike Mike Cannon-Brookes mi...@at... ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner -------------------------------------------------------- > Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software > Legendary Services - http://www.atlassian.com/support On 21/5/02 12:17 PM, "Heng Sin Low" (low...@ya...) penned the words: > We are actually running Oracle OC4j 1.0.2.2 here ( > which is based on Orion ) and we are facing the > PropertyTag and ComponentTag problem that is mention > in previous mail ( Webwork 1.0.3 ). I haven't try it > on the latest orion and oc4j version though. > > Btw, I'm not aware of the flag u mention, what is it > use for and where can I set it ? > > thanks. > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Heng S. L. <low...@ya...> - 2002-05-21 02:17:40
|
We are actually running Oracle OC4j 1.0.2.2 here ( which is based on Orion ) and we are facing the PropertyTag and ComponentTag problem that is mention in previous mail ( Webwork 1.0.3 ). I haven't try it on the latest orion and oc4j version though. Btw, I'm not aware of the flag u mention, what is it use for and where can I set it ? thanks. Regards, Low __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com |
|
From: Heng S. L. <low...@ya...> - 2002-05-21 02:10:53
|
1. It might be usefull if there is support for uploading to memory too. It can improve performance at the expense of more memory usage ( usefull when u know the size is small ). 2. maxSize tends to be action specific, I think a mechanism that allow the action to override the maxSize should be usefull here. Just my 2cent. Regards, Low __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com |
|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-05-21 02:07:46
|
I have to say that JIRA runs perfectly on Orion - and uses almost every webwork tag. Is there a specific tag that breaks? Are you running Orion with the jsp.reuse.rags flag off? Cheers, Mike rebelutionary - http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789 "You know it makes sense - Java, J2EE, OSX, more..." On 21/5/02 11:49 AM, "Heng Sin Low" (low...@ya...) penned the words: > Yes, it seems like a bug to me. In the > ComponentTag.release method, getStack().popValue() was > called after super.release() which would set the stack > to null and the container would propably set the > pageContext to null too. I think the push and pop > value call should be put in a try finally block in the > doEndTag() method instead. I suspect there is a > problem with the PropertyTag too as Orion doesn't seem > to call the release method before reusing a tag > instance ( this would break the escape null checking > logic ). > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user |
|
From: Heng S. L. <low...@ya...> - 2002-05-21 01:49:33
|
Yes, it seems like a bug to me. In the ComponentTag.release method, getStack().popValue() was called after super.release() which would set the stack to null and the container would propably set the pageContext to null too. I think the push and pop value call should be put in a try finally block in the doEndTag() method instead. I suspect there is a problem with the PropertyTag too as Orion doesn't seem to call the release method before reusing a tag instance ( this would break the escape null checking logic ). Regards, Low __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com |
|
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-05-20 21:13:51
|
I eliminated the multipart filter and moved this logic into the dispatcher. Thanks Pat for your input. -Matt > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Lightbody" <pli...@ho...> > To: "Matt Baldree" <ma...@sm...>; "Webwork-User" > <web...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 6:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] multipart support > > > > I don't understand why you can't just make the ServletDispatcher figure > out > > if the request is multipart and if so act accordingly? Why not make the > > entire thing transparent and also still avoid using filters unless > > absolutely necessary. I know most implementations can do filters now, so > > that's not the issue, but the more transparent this feature is, the > better! > > Just my two cents... > > > > -Pat > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Matt Baldree" <ma...@sm...> > > To: "Webwork-User" <web...@li...> > > Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 11:51 AM > > Subject: [Webwork-user] multipart support > > > > > > > I added multipart support to WW. I looked at a couple of approaches at > > > solving this problem and settled in using a filter to wrap the request. > I > > > thought this was the cleanest, less obtrusive solution. You have the > > ability > > > to choose between Jason's multipart parse (watch the license) and Pell's > > by > > > setting a new property setting "webwork.multipart.parser". You can > always > > > add your own parser and adapter if you like. See "Multipart Request > Test" > > > for more details. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. > > > Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Webwork-user mailing list > > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user > > > > > > > |
3279 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
