webwork-devel Mailing List for WebWork (Page 14)
Brought to you by:
baldree,
rickardoberg
You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(316) |
Dec
(117) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(197) |
Feb
(229) |
Mar
(293) |
Apr
(177) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Hai P. <yf...@ya...> - 2002-04-02 22:29:51
|
Hi, Currently there are two minor usage problems with CommandDriven factory. I will summarize them briefly below. A patch is attached along in this email. 1. Command Name: Right now the name of the command is fetched from the value of the submit button: i.e.: for <input type="submit" name="command" value="Add"/>, the command would be "Add". Now that's fine for name in English or in one locale. However, it won't work if the value is changing depending on the current locale. I propose to add the following feature: If the user specifies: <input type="submit" name="command{MyCommand}" value="Add"/> (note the additional '{MyCommand}') then ww will use "MyCommand" as the command name instead of using the value of the submit button. 2. Recursive CommandDriven invocation: This happens when there is a "command" parameter in the request's parameter list. This command is supposed to be used by the action handling the form only. Now, if within that action, you dynamically execute another CommandDriven action, or within the view of that action you use <webwork:action> or #action (velocity), ww will set and invoke the same command. This is not an expected behavior. Of course you can use MyAction!myCommand to get around that, but right now it doesn't seem to work with action alias. The quick fix is to check if the action name ends with '!'; if it does then we need not to set the command. Regards, ======================= Diff ========================= F:\external_projects\webwork\src\main\webwork\action\factory>cvs diff CommandAct ionFactoryProxy.java Index: CommandActionFactoryProxy.java =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/webwork/webwork/src/main/webwork/action/factory/CommandAction FactoryProxy.java,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -r1.10 CommandActionFactoryProxy.java 12a13,15 > import java.util.Set; > import java.util.Iterator; > 49,50c52,55 < if (idx != -1) < { --- > > if ( idx == aName.length() - 1 ){ > return getNextFactory().getActionImpl(aName.substring(0, idx)); > }else if (idx != -1) { 69a75,87 > }else{ > Set keys = ActionContext.getContext().getParameters().keySet(); > String keyName; > > for ( Iterator iter = keys.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); ){ > keyName = (String) iter.next(); > > if ( keyName.startsWith("command{") && keyName.endsWith("}") ) { > ((CommandDriven) action).setCommand( > keyName.substring(8, keyName.length() - 1)); > break; > } > } ===== --------------------------------------------- Hai Pham Quang --------------------------------------------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ |
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-02 22:26:58
|
> I believe that WW could be independent but work closely with JBoss to deliver some unique things. I think you misunderstood. I thought I was clear but maybe not that WW is still independent just like Jetty, Apache Axis, etc. On Tue, 02 April 2002, "Victor Salaman" wrote > > >The way I see it JBoss would merely provide a good means of exposure, > >and also be a great showcase. My intention would be to create some kind > >of portal framework that drives JBoss.org, using WW. > > > > You see, now this is a good application and marketing conduit. It also makes > sense... Somehow your previous message was misinterpreted by Matt and Kjetil > as you wanting to integrate WebWork to the JBoss core, for which I see no > reason and no added benefit to either project. > > /V > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
From: Victor S. <vsa...@ho...> - 2002-04-02 22:26:38
|
> >Please refrain from using this kind of comments. Why? Have somehow cigarretes been banned in Sweden? :) >I don't think it's the technical part of it, just as there would be no >technical point in going with OpenSymphony. > I have a different opinion, since technically both are tools that complement each other mostly in order to deliver a great development platform to the end user. Marketing-wise, none of the two groups have a powerful exposure, so the point is all technical. > >>WW is also decoupled technology that is meant to be a multi-purpose >>framework not only for web but for any type of application. By focusing on >>integration we're just diluting the original intent of the product. > > >Noone said integration. You did. > > Actually, Matt did. <quote> I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be good, but throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist. For instance, Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I think its coat tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld. In addition, I know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them straight. So, my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under JBoss's umbrella. My $0.02 </quote> "I believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework" -- Matt >>By even thinking on integrating to a specific vendor, we're already >>loosing userbase, as a lot of people using WW are not jBoss/Jetty, >>jBoss/Tomcat users and some will never be. > >Your reasoning is peculiar since there are many other cases of projects >(Velocity, Struts, log4j) where they are used with servers other than that >of the umbrella organization (Jakarta/Tomcat). > >What's your point? > Those are all tools. Tools are meant to be cross-used. There's a big difference between Tools and AppServers. Would BEA replace their Web container with Tomcat or Jetty? after all, they're free and have a non-restrictive licensing model. On the other hand, a WL user can use Velocity, Struts, Webwork or Log4J :) ... That's my point. _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com |
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-02 22:13:59
|
Victor Salaman wrote: > I just see nothing that could be added to WebWork relating to JBoss,=20 > since as a tool it is used to make applications, and is therefore not=20 > part of the environment. Ok. So, since WW is so well encapsulated and generic, by the above logic=20 there would be no point in joining any umbrella organization whatsoever,=20 including OpenSymphony. Right? I can see no other conclusion from your above statement. > We just should not ride in a marketing bus without a reason since it's=20 > pointless.=20 Sure, but there is a point. Why do you think app vendors are=20 buying&integrating frameworks into their suites? Because users want as=20 complete a framework as possible, and if something is officially shipped=20 with the appserver it's sure to work with it. > There are far better ways of marketing than to be out of=20 > focus! :) I bet you love those nice "Buy me now" banner ads popping up=20 > when you're reading a news article in JDJ or JavaWorld!, and the item=20 > has nothing to do with what you're reading, or interesting to reading=20 > audience. You're rambling. Get to the point. > I'll give you a couple of reasons Struts is a winner: >=20 > -- Part of Apache, instant marketing. > -- Exposure by Apache, Sun, and everyone that makes tools (they make=20 > money out of this you know) > -- Articles written > -- GOOD MARKETING I agree. > I'll also give some reasons too for JBoss being successful: >=20 > -- Good technology. > -- Viable alternative to commercial software. > -- JBoss group makes money by selling documentation, consulting, and=20 > giving concerences. > -- GOOD MARKETING Yup. > Now the reason for Struts being more successful than WW: >=20 > -- They have marketing Absolutely, plus a head start. > Orion for example, is superior to Weblogic, but have poor docs, and=20 > extremely lame marketing, nonetheless the product is better.... but BEA= =20 > markets their product, Ironflare hmmmm.... But this is contradictory to your initial argument that WW should not=20 join JBoss. You're confusing. > My point is... Instead of trying to catch someone else's wave... let's=20 > work towards creating a wave.... If that's your point, then why the above argument which points in the=20 opposite direction!? /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |
From: Victor S. <vsa...@ho...> - 2002-04-02 22:11:19
|
>The way I see it JBoss would merely provide a good means of exposure, >and also be a great showcase. My intention would be to create some kind >of portal framework that drives JBoss.org, using WW. > You see, now this is a good application and marketing conduit. It also makes sense... Somehow your previous message was misinterpreted by Matt and Kjetil as you wanting to integrate WebWork to the JBoss core, for which I see no reason and no added benefit to either project. /V _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-02 22:06:45
|
ma...@sm... wrote: > My comparison with Jetty is not based on a web > container but the fact that it is a standalone project > that has hooked up with JBoss. JBoss has expanded to > provide additional offerings such as JBoss.Net which > uses Apache Axis another separate project. I believe > that WW could be independent but work closely with > JBoss to deliver some unique things. Obviously, this is > at a conceptual level but there is possibility. Maybe, > Rickard could enlighten us on some possibilities. The way I see it JBoss would merely provide a good means of exposure,=20 and also be a great showcase. My intention would be to create some kind=20 of portal framework that drives JBoss.org, using WW. > Has Jetty lost user base because they are working with > JBoss? I don't think so.=20 On the contrary, since there is now no reason to not use Jetty because=20 it's "not an appserver". > I think either directions for > WW is a win, but I disagree with your analysis. I agree with your analysis. /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-02 22:04:02
|
Victor Salaman wrote: > With all due respect, What are you smoking? Please refrain from using this kind of comments. > JBoss is an excellent revolutionary product which has a lot of=20 > potential, but it's still an appserver, and WW is a framework to be use= d=20 > on any appserver (with webcontainer or not). I really don't see what=20 > could be gained technically by integrating WW to jBoss (and I really=20 > don't know what there is to integrate, as WW already works flawlessly i= n=20 > most environments... if you do, please enlighten me!). I don't think it's the technical part of it, just as there would be no=20 technical point in going with OpenSymphony. > WW is also decoupled technology that is meant to be a multi-purpose=20 > framework not only for web but for any type of application. By focusing= =20 > on integration we're just diluting the original intent of the product. Noone said integration. You did. > <rant> > And if what you're suffering is Struts envy, everytime you feel that=20 > way, write a JavaWorld article :) ... The only reason it has a strong=20 > userbase is because of marketing merits not technical ones. > </rant> We will. > By even thinking on integrating to a specific vendor, we're already=20 > loosing userbase, as a lot of people using WW are not jBoss/Jetty,=20 > jBoss/Tomcat users and some will never be. Your reasoning is peculiar since there are many other cases of projects=20 (Velocity, Struts, log4j) where they are used with servers other than=20 that of the umbrella organization (Jakarta/Tomcat). What's your point? /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |
From: Victor S. <vsa...@ho...> - 2002-04-02 22:03:41
|
>My comparison with Jetty is not based on a web >container but the fact that it is a standalone project >that has hooked up with JBoss. JBoss has expanded to >provide additional offerings such as JBoss.Net which >uses Apache Axis another separate project. I believe >that WW could be independent but work closely with >JBoss to deliver some unique things. Obviously, this is >at a conceptual level but there is possibility. Maybe, >Rickard could enlighten us on some possibilities. > Cupholder holds Cup Cars transport people Airplanes transport people Computer monitors are used to display data. All of these are facts of different items and their relationship/dependencies. There's fact relation I forgot to mention: JbossGPA is microkernel which can be be used to "contain" other containers and provide a series of services. Among these services, jBoss aims to provide a suitable platform to deploy J2EE applications (a specification). This is the reason for the EJB container (EJB Spec), the Web Container (Servlets/JSP spec), jBossMQ (JMS Spec), Security (JAAS Spec), RARDeployer and friends (JCA Spec)... Additionallity to this, JBoss, having a generic services architecture, also allows you to plug in whatever feature you desire in an easy way. Those are services, and JBoss is a tool. The reason the JBoss group integrated Jetty in the core was that they desperately needed a Web container and Catalina's prupose is in life is not compatible with JBoss'... Jetty on the other hand, is a perfect match, being small and programatically configurable. I just see nothing that could be added to WebWork relating to JBoss, since as a tool it is used to make applications, and is therefore not part of the environment. Microsoft with all their money, could not ever make Microsoft Bob fly... >Has Jetty lost user base because they are working with >JBoss? I don't think so. I think either directions for >WW is a win, but I disagree with your analysis. > Comparing Apples to Oranges again... Jetty has nothing to loose as it's a servlet container which is usually embedded in other applications. It's in their core purpose to be integrated to anything, as that, specifically is its purpose. Jetty has ALL to win. We just should not ride in a marketing bus without a reason since it's pointless. There are far better ways of marketing than to be out of focus! :) I bet you love those nice "Buy me now" banner ads popping up when you're reading a news article in JDJ or JavaWorld!, and the item has nothing to do with what you're reading, or interesting to reading audience. I'll give you a couple of reasons Struts is a winner: -- Part of Apache, instant marketing. -- Exposure by Apache, Sun, and everyone that makes tools (they make money out of this you know) -- Articles written -- GOOD MARKETING I'll also give some reasons too for JBoss being successful: -- Good technology. -- Viable alternative to commercial software. -- JBoss group makes money by selling documentation, consulting, and giving concerences. -- GOOD MARKETING Now the reason for Struts being more successful than WW: -- They have marketing Orion for example, is superior to Weblogic, but have poor docs, and extremely lame marketing, nonetheless the product is better.... but BEA markets their product, Ironflare hmmmm.... My point is... Instead of trying to catch someone else's wave... let's work towards creating a wave.... /V _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx |
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-02 21:52:32
|
I wanted to initiate a discussion for next release features, requirements people feel are important for WW. I hope collectively, we can come up with a good list which we can prioritize and delegate. So here goes. Documentation 1. Better velocity documentation Enhancements 1. More velocity macros, etc. 2. WML tags 3. XHTML tags Misc 1. Bug list 2. Feature list 3. Instrument/profile code - where is our bottlenecks? how well does WW scale? 4. Logging - overhaul debug statements to use proper logging levels - debug, info, etc. 5. Nightly builds Incorporating new view technologies 1. Flash 2. Apache Axis? -Matt |
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-02 21:37:45
|
Several people have e-mailed asking about participating in WW development. So, I wanted to throw out a typical approach which Apache XML group uses and see if this is a good start. If so, I would create a FAQ. 1) Download the source. 2) Build it. 3) Find something wrong with it. 4) Fix it. 5) Send a patch with your fix to webwork-devel. 6) Repeat steps 3 through 5 a few times. 7) Point out how much better it would be if you were a WebWork developer and could just check things in without other people having to submit your patches for you. 8) Get approved as a developer. Please speak up otherwise, I will assume this is okay. -Matt |
From: <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-02 20:15:15
|
My comparison with Jetty is not based on a web container but the fact that it is a standalone project that has hooked up with JBoss. JBoss has expanded to provide additional offerings such as JBoss.Net which uses Apache Axis another separate project. I believe that WW could be independent but work closely with JBoss to deliver some unique things. Obviously, this is at a conceptual level but there is possibility. Maybe, Rickard could enlighten us on some possibilities. Has Jetty lost user base because they are working with JBoss? I don't think so. I think either directions for WW is a win, but I disagree with your analysis. -Matt On Tue, 02 April 2002, "Victor Salaman" wrote > > >I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be good, but > >throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist. For instance, > >Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I > >believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I think its coat > >tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld. In addition, > >I > >know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them straight. So, > >my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under > >JBoss's umbrella. > > > > Matt, > > With all due respect, What are you smoking? The reason for Jetty being > integrated with jBoss is because jBoss has no web container. And that being > the case, jboss needed to be integrated to a web container to avoid being > chewed up by the competition. That is all well and understandable. > > JBoss is an excellent revolutionary product which has a lot of potential, > but it's still an appserver, and WW is a framework to be used on any > appserver (with webcontainer or not). I really don't see what could be > gained technically by integrating WW to jBoss (and I really don't know what > there is to integrate, as WW already works flawlessly in most > environments... if you do, please enlighten me!). > > WW is also decoupled technology that is meant to be a multi-purpose > framework not only for web but for any type of application. By focusing on > integration we're just diluting the original intent of the product. > > <rant> > And if what you're suffering is Struts envy, everytime you feel that way, > write a JavaWorld article :) ... The only reason it has a strong userbase is > because of marketing merits not technical ones. > </rant> > > By even thinking on integrating to a specific vendor, we're already loosing > userbase, as a lot of people using WW are not jBoss/Jetty, jBoss/Tomcat > users and some will never be. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel |
From: Victor S. <vsa...@ho...> - 2002-04-02 19:49:34
|
>I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be good, but >throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist. For instance, >Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I >believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I think its coat >tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld. In addition, >I >know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them straight. So, >my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under >JBoss's umbrella. > Matt, With all due respect, What are you smoking? The reason for Jetty being integrated with jBoss is because jBoss has no web container. And that being the case, jboss needed to be integrated to a web container to avoid being chewed up by the competition. That is all well and understandable. JBoss is an excellent revolutionary product which has a lot of potential, but it's still an appserver, and WW is a framework to be used on any appserver (with webcontainer or not). I really don't see what could be gained technically by integrating WW to jBoss (and I really don't know what there is to integrate, as WW already works flawlessly in most environments... if you do, please enlighten me!). WW is also decoupled technology that is meant to be a multi-purpose framework not only for web but for any type of application. By focusing on integration we're just diluting the original intent of the product. <rant> And if what you're suffering is Struts envy, everytime you feel that way, write a JavaWorld article :) ... The only reason it has a strong userbase is because of marketing merits not technical ones. </rant> By even thinking on integrating to a specific vendor, we're already loosing userbase, as a lot of people using WW are not jBoss/Jetty, jBoss/Tomcat users and some will never be. _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
From: Kjetil P. <kje...@mo...> - 2002-04-02 18:55:43
|
Completely agree, this is at opportunity of attention we can't get = elsewhere. /kjetilhp > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Baldree [mailto:ma...@sm...] > Sent: 2. april 2002 03:05 > To: Rickard > Cc: Webwork-Developer > Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together >=20 >=20 > I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be=20 > good, but > throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist.=20 > For instance, > Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I > believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I=20 > think its coat > tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld.=20 > In addition, I > know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them=20 > straight. So, > my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under > JBoss's umbrella. >=20 > My $0.02 >=20 > -Matt >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rickard" <ri...@mi...> > To: "Matt Baldree" <ma...@sm...> > Cc: "Webwork-Developer" <web...@li...> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together >=20 >=20 > Matt Baldree wrote: >=20 > > For those of us that missed the get together, would it be=20 > possible for > > someone to post some highlights? >=20 > Well, it was a pretty modest gettogether (me, Kjetil, Maurice + 3 from > OpenSymphony, oh and Cedric from BEA). You were sorely missed Matt! >=20 > Mostly we just chatted, but we did talk about some about what to do > next. Supporting Flash as client was pretty high on the list, and from > what I can tell it should be trivial to do. I'm gonna get some > HelloWorld examples from Macromedia and convert them to use WW. >=20 > We also talked some about what would be the best way to go for WW in > terms of greater exposure. On the one hand OpenSymphony does=20 > make sense > (as already discussed), but on the other hand joining JBoss=20 > (which I'll > probably join up with again, now that I quit from TSS) would give us a > much more even footing with Struts. Because believe it or not, the > primary question I got last week was "So, who does this relate to > Struts?". Argh... >=20 > So, that was pretty much it. Good beer good chat good place. :-) >=20 > /Rickard >=20 > -- > Rickard =D6berg >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel >=20 |
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-02 01:05:07
|
I think OS has done a good job and working with them would be good, but throwing in a new opportunity such as JBoss adds a new twist. For instance, Jetty is a separate project that is embedded in JBoss so why not WW? I believe JBoss could use a good web tier framework, and I think its coat tails have grown since it won best app server from JavaWorld. In addition, I know Jakarta solicited them to come aboard but Marc set them straight. So, my vote is JBoss. I think WW has the greatest potential to grow under JBoss's umbrella. My $0.02 -Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rickard" <ri...@mi...> To: "Matt Baldree" <ma...@sm...> Cc: "Webwork-Developer" <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:05 AM Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together Matt Baldree wrote: > For those of us that missed the get together, would it be possible for > someone to post some highlights? Well, it was a pretty modest gettogether (me, Kjetil, Maurice + 3 from OpenSymphony, oh and Cedric from BEA). You were sorely missed Matt! Mostly we just chatted, but we did talk about some about what to do next. Supporting Flash as client was pretty high on the list, and from what I can tell it should be trivial to do. I'm gonna get some HelloWorld examples from Macromedia and convert them to use WW. We also talked some about what would be the best way to go for WW in terms of greater exposure. On the one hand OpenSymphony does make sense (as already discussed), but on the other hand joining JBoss (which I'll probably join up with again, now that I quit from TSS) would give us a much more even footing with Struts. Because believe it or not, the primary question I got last week was "So, who does this relate to Struts?". Argh... So, that was pretty much it. Good beer good chat good place. :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg _______________________________________________ Webwork-devel mailing list Web...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel |
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-01 17:20:47
|
Patrick Lightbody wrote: > Well that was a short tenure at TSS :) But educational. Now on with the show. > As for OpenSymphony, I know I'd love to see these two groups work=20 > together, I think it would make a lot of sense. As for JBoss, I don't=20 > exactly see how WW fits in with JBoss... is there a relationship I'm=20 > missing? JBoss is everything but the servlet/jsp container (which is to= o=20 > bad since that means it depends on Tomcrap),=20 Look again. No Tomcrap. > and WW requires only a=20 > servlet/jsp container. Yes. My next projects will be a portal framework and stuff related to=20 Semantic Web, both of which would be highly relevant to the JBoss=20 project. So, that would be the connection, although the code as such=20 would of course be container-independent. > Anyway, congrats on the new endevours, whatever they may be! Well, I couldn't have imagined this a year ago, so I won't try to guess=20 what's up and coming. But it's probably going to be fun. :-) /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |
From: Patrick L. <pli...@ho...> - 2002-04-01 16:34:18
|
Well that was a short tenure at TSS :) As for OpenSymphony, I know I'd love to see these two groups work together, I think it would make a lot of sense. As for JBoss, I don't exactly see how WW fits in with JBoss... is there a relationship I'm missing? JBoss is everything but the servlet/jsp container (which is too bad since that means it depends on Tomcrap), and WW requires only a servlet/jsp container. Anyway, congrats on the new endevours, whatever they may be! -Pat >From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> >To: Matt Baldree <ma...@sm...> >CC: Webwork-Developer <web...@li...> >Subject: Re: [Webwork-devel] WW/JavaOne get together >Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 11:05:38 +0200 > >Matt Baldree wrote: > >>For those of us that missed the get together, would it be possible for >>someone to post some highlights? > >Well, it was a pretty modest gettogether (me, Kjetil, Maurice + 3 from >OpenSymphony, oh and Cedric from BEA). You were sorely missed Matt! > >Mostly we just chatted, but we did talk about some about what to do next. >Supporting Flash as client was pretty high on the list, and from what I can >tell it should be trivial to do. I'm gonna get some HelloWorld examples >from Macromedia and convert them to use WW. > >We also talked some about what would be the best way to go for WW in terms >of greater exposure. On the one hand OpenSymphony does make sense (as >already discussed), but on the other hand joining JBoss (which I'll >probably join up with again, now that I quit from TSS) would give us a much >more even footing with Struts. Because believe it or not, the primary >question I got last week was "So, who does this relate to Struts?". Argh... > >So, that was pretty much it. Good beer good chat good place. :-) > >/Rickard > >-- >Rickard Öberg > > >_______________________________________________ >Webwork-devel mailing list >Web...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-devel _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx |
From: Rickard <ri...@mi...> - 2002-04-01 09:07:08
|
Matt Baldree wrote: > For those of us that missed the get together, would it be possible for > someone to post some highlights? Well, it was a pretty modest gettogether (me, Kjetil, Maurice + 3 from=20 OpenSymphony, oh and Cedric from BEA). You were sorely missed Matt! Mostly we just chatted, but we did talk about some about what to do=20 next. Supporting Flash as client was pretty high on the list, and from=20 what I can tell it should be trivial to do. I'm gonna get some=20 HelloWorld examples from Macromedia and convert them to use WW. We also talked some about what would be the best way to go for WW in=20 terms of greater exposure. On the one hand OpenSymphony does make sense=20 (as already discussed), but on the other hand joining JBoss (which I'll=20 probably join up with again, now that I quit from TSS) would give us a=20 much more even footing with Struts. Because believe it or not, the=20 primary question I got last week was "So, who does this relate to=20 Struts?". Argh... So, that was pretty much it. Good beer good chat good place. :-) /Rickard --=20 Rickard =D6berg |
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-04-01 00:39:16
|
For those of us that missed the get together, would it be possible for someone to post some highlights? -Matt |
From: matt b. <ba...@us...> - 2002-03-28 12:41:50
|
Update of /cvsroot/webwork/webwork/src/docs In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv625 Modified Files: faq.xml Log Message: added mail search and tomcat faq |
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-03-25 13:02:36
|
There seems to be a problem with running WW's example WAR in Tomcat with JDK1.4 using Tomcat's startup.bat (see console output below). The problem has been tracked down to the fact that Tomcat using JDK's XML parser is having problems extracting the taglib.tld from webwork.jar. The patch fix is to extract the tld file from the jar and modify the web.xml to point to this file. I will make the change in CVS so this fix will be incorporated in a future release. Tomcat console output ---- Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache Tomcat/4.0.3 PARSE error at line 1 column 1 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The markup in the document preceding the root ele ment must be well-formed. -Matt |
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2002-03-23 21:15:16
|
Great news! I sent an email to some of the OpenSymphony mailing lists to get any OS users along too - hope noone minds ;) (All the OS core developers use WW anyway, those that don't should use WW so we can convince them en masse) Will see you all there. Cheers, Mike Mike Cannon-Brookes mi...@at... ATLASSIAN - Your J2EE Expert Partner -------------------------------------------------------- > Brilliant Software - http://www.atlassian.com/software > Legendary Services - http://www.atlassian.com/support On 22/3/02 10:39 PM, "Rickard" (ri...@mi...) penned the words: > Rickard wrote: > >>> Could everyone who is planning to show up for a beer please drop me a >>> mail... >> >> Well, I won't be there. It seems it wasn't meant to be, and there's >> weirdness going on behind the scenes here. I would've really enjoyed to >> meet ya'll but it'll have to wait until another time. > > Change of plans. I *will* be there (courtesy of Marc F). *phew*.. that > was close.. now all I gotta do is find a place to stay.. > > /Rickard |
From: Matt B. <ma...@sm...> - 2002-03-23 14:44:03
|
I just released 1.0.1 which includes a full length HTML of the docs, a PDF of the docs, and a fix to taglib.tld which caused some random parse errors for a few people. -Matt |
From: matt b. <ba...@us...> - 2002-03-23 13:59:34
|
Update of /cvsroot/webwork/webwork/lib/pdf In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv12937 Added Files: html-to-pdf-settings.book Log Message: no message |
From: matt b. <ba...@us...> - 2002-03-23 13:26:20
|
Update of /cvsroot/webwork/webwork/src/resources/web/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv6262 Modified Files: taglib.tld Log Message: added namespace |
From: matt b. <ba...@us...> - 2002-03-23 13:24:04
|
Update of /cvsroot/webwork/webwork/src/build In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv5845 Modified Files: build.xml Log Message: target docs now builds a index-all.html that is a one long page doc |