From: Mike O. <ir...@ms...> - 2001-05-11 21:21:26
|
On Fri, May 12, 2001 at 03:40:18PM -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > I develop sites for clients and the question always comes down to this: > What is the profile of the users of the site? True, our users' profile is a bit unusual. A significant %age (A) don't have IE available on their platform, (B) use non-mainstream or experimental browsers, (C) live in countries where they can't afford recent hardware, and/or (D) would be less likely to buy our products if they perceive we've "sold out to the Netscape-and-IE-enhanced crowd". > If they have technology X (cookies, style sheets, whatever), then we use > that to our advantage. "Have" usually means "99%" because putting in the > extra development hours, consideration and testing for the 1% that are > using Netscape 3.x (for example) is not worth the expense. Leveraging the technology they have is good, but I also look at what is the minimum technology necessary to do the job. If you're presenting a catalog, of course you will need product images. But if other images are just decorations peripheral to the content, why not skip them? Java script that presses a submit button for you when you press Enter is cool. Javascript that pops up a special window without a menu bar for what is really an ordinary HTML file, um... -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, ir...@ms... (if mail problems: ms...@ji...) http://mso.oz.net/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol |