From: Chuck E. <ec...@mi...> - 2001-04-30 22:00:09
|
At 02:40 PM 4/30/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: >If we're going to support formatting attributes a la DTML, we may as >well use the same attribute names except where there's a particular >reason to be different. Especially since the ones DTML supports >are pretty comprehensive and useful for HTML output (html_quote, url_quote, >newline_to_br, etc). > >A reference to DTML's formatting attributes is >http://www.zope.org/Members/michel/ZB/AppendixA.dtml >(scroll down to "html_quote"). Yeah, that's where I got many of them. However, I chose to go with better names rather than Zope compatibility. If we actually had a DTML like syntax that would be one thing. But we're not even close to DTML so I don't see the point (as I do with Velocity). Also there are good arguments for some of the names. For example, htmlEncode and urlEncode already exist in WebUtils.Funcs and Page. "width" makes a lot more sense than "size" And so on. -Chuck |