From: Terrel S. <tsh...@tr...> - 2001-01-22 19:36:32
|
Jay Love wrote: > I have looked at it, and I plan to do a ZODB then a ZEO kit on top of that. > > But, for the Sessions store, I don't think ths would be the best > solution, as ZODB is reportedly only efficient for lots of reads and > minimal writes. > Interesting. That seems to be a complaint about MySQL too under heavy load, because of the table-locking. Maybe ZODB's transaction subsystem chould use some help. Of course, I am running on hearsay right now--I'd better shut up and do some research. I am working on a project for school that was inspired by ZODB and other transactional filesystems. It is in its infancy right now, but I need to flesh it out at least by the end of the quarter (mid March). If anyone is interested, I will be posting a rough proposal to my web page sometime today. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~tshumway/filesys/ |