From: Tavis R. <ta...@re...> - 2002-06-20 19:13:23
|
Edmund, I agree that this problem with Emacs should be fixed. However, I disagree= with=20 your argument. Take it to the extreme and you end up with statements lik= e=20 "Operation system X has a broken implementation of Y, but who cares! That= 's=20 their problem. Why should our code be crippled because they don't support= =20 it?" Emacs has a large constituency, particularly among Python coders, a= nd=20 the benefits of making them 'like' reading your code far outweigh the min= or=20 inconvenience of using """ instead of '''. Tavis On June 20, 2002 12:01 pm, Edmund Lian wrote: > Ian and Tavis, thanks for the quick reply regarding single versus doubl= e > quoted triplets. Seems to me though, that if the issue is Emacs can't > understand triple quoted strings that use apostrophes, then Emacs shoul= d be > fixed, not Python source code. > > Once everybody starts going down the path of adapting coding habits to = the > limitations and idiosyncracies of editors, there'll be no end of troubl= e. > E.g., "oh, editor X doesn't handle Y well, so let's not use Y either, s= ince > we did the same for Emacs". I can't see any particular reason why one > should favor helping Emacs over another editor... > > ...Edmund. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Webware-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel |