From: Ian B. <ia...@co...> - 2003-01-22 19:55:04
|
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 13:35, Stuart Donaldson wrote: > Speaking of FFK, I have not been paying attention to the discussion on > it lately, but seem to recall that some changes possibly in architecture > have been considered, or are taking place. But it looks like the docs > haven't been updated in a while, are they still accurate? Are there any > changes that someone should be aware of before looking into FFK for the > first time? No, the instructions are pretty much accurate. I haven't committed any of the larger changes, and I'm still not sure about whether I'll make those changes. > Also, this may have been discussed before I started paying attention, > but should we consider rolling FFK into Webware? It looks like it > depends on Webware, and it seems like most of the discussion regarding > FFK takes place in the Webware-discuss list. Also, I wonder if it > wouldn't add more to Webware as a package if it was delivered with added > functionality such as FFK. I don't know, perhaps -- right now FFK isn't released in sync with Webware. If I was confident that the interface would remain the same over time I'd be more inclined to include it. There's also DAVKit and EmailKit -- neither of which necessarily has to be an actual separate kit, that's just how I distributed them. EmailKit is basically just a single adapter, while DAVKit is analogous to XMLRPC support. There might also be other kits by people that I'm forgetting. I know there's a FormKit. I can't remember anything else at the moment, though. -- Ian Bicking Colorstudy Web Development ia...@co... http://www.colorstudy.com PGP: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x9B9E28B7 4869 N Talman Ave, Chicago, IL 60625 / (773) 275-7241 |