[Webmagick-users] st that morning (to comp

[Lyndon <see...@be...>]

Itor, one sports sub-editor, two reporters, a cartoonist and a
correspondent resigned from the Herald. Instead of deceiving oneself by
calling these people 'opportunistic and mercenary', it would be more
profitable for Mr Narayan to be honest -- at least to himself -- over
why such a number of journalists resigned from the paper. May we point
out that under Mr Narayan's stewardship itself, not a single journalist
involved in launching the English-language Herald a little over four
years ago is still with the paper today, except for Mr Narayan himself.
And, would Mr Narayan care to explain why it is only in his paper that
'opportunistic and mercenary people' (including us, by his definition)
are found in such large numbers when it comes to looking for jobs
elsewhere? To us who know, Mr Narayan is hardly convincing when he says
that 'some junior people may have left' but Herald's 'top is still
intact'. It calls for deep soul-searching on the part of Mr Narayan to
find out why scores of journalists have resigned from the Herald since
October 10, 1983 -- the date which the paper was launched... ON THE FLIP
side, Rajan -- at least in his early phase -- had the ability of
encouraging his staff. After a great job done in covering the
Commonwealth Retreat, the reward was not just a good word but also a
meal at the nearby Hotel Aroma. (For the CHOGM, Devika Sequeira and