Menu
▾
▴
webadmin-list
|
From: Christoph F. <ch...@di...> - 2001-01-30 10:27:10
|
Hi, is it possible to use BIND9 with webmin? There are some serious bug in v8 (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-02.html), so i would like to upgrade... Greetings! Christoph |
|
From: Philippe B. <bar...@ag...> - 2001-01-30 11:11:36
|
The bug fixes are available for debian and FreeBSD at last. I wouldn't recommend using bind9 sinci it is not, in my opinion tested enough. Use djbdns instead or upgrade to bind 8.2.3. Philippe On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:26:01AM +0100, Christoph Frei wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to use BIND9 with webmin? There are some > serious bug in v8 (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-02.html), > so i would like to upgrade... > > > Greetings! > > Christoph > > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@we... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > -- Philippe BARNETCHE AGISphere 14, Boulevard Vital Bouhot 92200 NEUILLY/SEINE 01 47 45 99 92 06 10 01 68 11 "He who sacrifices functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." |
|
From: NDSoftware <ex...@nd...> - 2001-01-30 15:23:31
|
Yes but the specific BIND 9 fonction are not available... Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware http://www.ndsoftware.net - nds...@nd... France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751 USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...]On Behalf Of Christoph Frei Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:26 AM To: web...@we... Subject: BIND9 Hi, is it possible to use BIND9 with webmin? There are some serious bug in v8 (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-02.html), so i would like to upgrade... Greetings! Christoph - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@we... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2025-04-16 19:39:34
|
Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.root drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” fails Add a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2025-04-16 23:05:48
|
Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.rootdrwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” failsAdd a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2025-04-17 00:14:29
|
In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already) Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lots of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list <web...@li...> Cc: web...@li...; Dave Overton <da...@sy...> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.root drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” fails Add a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2025-04-17 01:12:12
|
Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains? On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote .. In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already)Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lots of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Cc: web...@li...; Dave Overton Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.rootdrwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” failsAdd a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2025-04-17 22:03:24
|
Working version:
zone "hunt-fish-game." {
type secondary;
primaries {
162.17.94.53;
};
file "secondary/hunt-fish-game.com.hosts";
};
Add a “master” to the Edit Zone Options:
zone "hunt-fish-game." {
type secondary;
primaries {
162.17.94.53;
};
file "secondary/hunt-fish-game.com.hosts";
masters {
162.17.94.53;
};
};
Dave Overton
Owner
SYIX.COM
sms or voice 530.755.1751
From: Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 6:12 PM
To: da...@sy...
Cc: web...@li...
Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9
Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains?
On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote ..
In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already)
Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file.
There are lot s of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone.
Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms.
Dave Overton< /span>
Owner
SYIX.COM
sms or voice 530.755.1751
From: Jamie Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM
To: da...@sy... <mailto:da...@sy...> ; Webmin users list
Cc: web...@li... <mailto:web...@li...> ; Dave Overton
Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9
Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug.
What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone?
On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote ..
Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary”
The folders on a default install look like this:
drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.root
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/
drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/
drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/
So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin.
Add a domain to the “Master” fails
Add a domain as a “Slave” fails.
Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore.
But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling)
(maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?)
Dave Overton
Owner
SYIX.COM
sms or voice 530.755.1751
|
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2025-04-17 22:15:09
|
Found another strange thing. (I’m moving a bunch of domains to a new server, so fun things abound.) This is technically a Virtualmin issue, but it’s sort of connected. This page: https://www.virtualmin.com/docs/data-operations/how-to-migrate-to-a-new-server First this: virtualmin backup-domain --dest /root/backups/ --all-domains --all-features --newformat --all-virtualmin Then This: virtualmin restore-domain --source /root/backups/virtualmin.tar.gz --all-virtualmin The “Cluster Slave Servers” don’t make the trip. So the restored domains (next thing on the list of things to do) fails to setup the secondary server on the remote machine, but it thinks it did… And doesn’t mention that all the create/delete on the “other” server fails. Like this: Deleting secondary DNS zone on ns2.syix.com .. .. done Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 6:12 PM To: da...@sy... Cc: web...@li... Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains? On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote .. In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already) Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lot s of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave Overton< /span> Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy... <mailto:da...@sy...> ; Webmin users list Cc: web...@li... <mailto:web...@li...> ; Dave Overton Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.root drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” fails Add a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2025-04-18 17:49:56
|
Were the same cluster slave servers already registered on the destination system? That would be required for this to work ... On 17/Apr/2025 15:14 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Found another strange thing. (I’m moving a bunch of domains to a new server, so fun things abound.) This is technically a Virtualmin issue, but it’s sort of connected. This page: https://www.virtualmin.com/docs/data-operations/how-to-migrate-to-a-new-server First this:virtualmin backup-domain --dest /root/backups/ --all-domains --all-features --newformat --all-virtualmin Then This:virtualmin restore-domain --source /root/backups/virtualmin.tar.gz --all-virtualmin The “Cluster Slave Servers” don’t make the trip. So the restored domains (next thing on the list of things to do) fails to setup the secondary server on the remote machine, but it thinks it did… And doesn’t mention that all the create/delete on the “other” server fails. Like this:Deleting secondary DNS zone on ns2.syix.com .. .. done Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 6:12 PM To: da...@sy... Cc: web...@li... Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains? On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote .. In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already)Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lot s of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave Overton< /span>OwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Cc: web...@li...; Dave Overton Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.rootdrwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Module in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” failsAdd a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Dave O. <da...@sy...> - 2025-04-18 18:51:55
|
Sometimes issues get too complex: 1. NS2 has been in service with just webmin installed for years, just being a slave/secondary server. 2. NS(others) come and go on individual virtualmin managed servers. 3. NS11 is moving from Centos to Rocky. NS2 is sitting bored and doing its job 4. NS11 has been in service for years. 5. Do the migrate thing, (just started over to verify all this) 6. Restore step “creates records on NS2” But really doesn’t. (I manually fixed the “slave/secondary” issue a while back and my fix is still in place) 7. Delete from rocky install to see what happens, says it removed records from NS2, but doesn’t. Make any sense to you? End result, removing a domain from a migrated install, doesn’t remove the secondary dns records. Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 10:49 AM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list <web...@li...> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Were the same cluster slave servers already registered on the destination system? That would be required for this to work ... On 17/Apr/2025 15:14 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Found another strange thing. (I’m moving a bunch of domains to a new server, so fun things abound.) This is technically a Virtualmin issue, but it’s sort of connected. This page: https://www.virtualmin.com/docs/data-operations/how-to-migrate-to-a-new-server First this: virtualmin backup-domain -- dest /root/backups/ --all-domains --all-features --newformat --all-virtualmin Then This: virtualmin restore-domain --source /root/backups/virtualmin.tar.gz --all-virtualmin The “Cluster Slave Servers” don’t make the trip. So the restored domains (next thing on the list of things to do) fails to setup the secondary server on the rem ote machine, but it thinks it did… And doesn’t mention that all the create/delete on the “other” server fails. Like this: Deleting secondary DNS zone on ns2.syix.com .. .. done Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 6:12 PM To: da...@sy... <mailto:da...@sy...> Cc: web...@li... <mailto:web...@li...> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains? On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote .. In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already) Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lot s of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave Overton< /span> Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Cc: web...@li...; Dave Overton Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.root drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/ drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Mod ule in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” fails Add a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave Overton Owner SYIX.COM sms or voice 530.755.1751 |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2025-04-19 03:33:43
|
Would it be possible to get the full output from those backup-domain and restore-domain commands? I'd like to see what it says about slave servers.. On 18/Apr/2025 11:51 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Sometimes issues get too complex: NS2 has been in service with just webmin installed for years, just being a slave/secondary server.NS(others) come and go on individual virtualmin managed servers.NS11 is moving from Centos to Rocky. NS2 is sitting bored and doing its jobNS11 has been in service for years.Do the migrate thing, (just started over to verify all this)Restore step “creates records on NS2” But really doesn’t. (I manually fixed the “slave/secondary” issue a while back and my fix is still in place)Delete from rocky install to see what happens, says it removed records from NS2, but doesn’t. Make any sense to you? End result, removing a domain from a migrated install, doesn’t remove the secondary dns records. Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 10:49 AM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Were the same cluster slave servers already registered on the destination system? That would be required for this to work ... On 17/Apr/2025 15:14 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Found another strange thing. (I’m moving a bunch of domains to a new server, so fun things abound.) This is technically a Virtualmin issue, but it’s sort of connected. This page: https://www.virtualmin.com/docs/data-operations/how-to-migrate-to-a-new-server First this:virtualmin backup-domain -- dest /root/backups/ --all-domains --all-features --newformat --all-virtualmin Then This:virtualmin restore-domain --source /root/backups/virtualmin.tar.gz --all-virtualmin The “Cluster Slave Servers” don’t make the trip. So the restored domains (next thing on the list of things to do) fails to setup the secondary server on the rem ote machine, but it thinks it did… And doesn’t mention that all the create/delete on the “other” server fails. Like this:Deleting secondary DNS zone on ns2.syix.com .. .. done Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 6:12 PM To: da...@sy... Cc: web...@li... Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Ok maybe Webmin is parsing the config incorrectly. Can you attach the block from named.conf for one of these problem slave domains? On 16/Apr/2025 17:14 Dave Overton wrote .. In the list of domains, open a slave domain. (one that works already)Look at the top, “Master servers” is empty. Technically since there are no master servers any more guess that’s correct, but the primary server should be listed there, and if I do add a server there it gets entered wrong in the named.conf file. There are lot s of places that the “master/slave” references are still there instead of “primary/secondary” but that can be generally handled, but I think probably for consistency the master/slave stuff should be gone. Not a political statement, just annoying that the server and webmin don’t use the same terms. Dave Overton< /span>OwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 From: Jamie Cameron Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 4:05 PM To: da...@sy...; Webmin users list Cc: web...@li...; Dave Overton Subject: Re: [webmin-l] BIND9 Webmin should already handle the different names for master/primary and secondary/slave zone names, unless there's a bug. What goes wrong exactly when you try to add a zone? On 16/Apr/2025 12:23 Dave Overton via webadmin-list wrote .. Bind 9 is “woke” and has been for a while, so we no longer have “Master/Slave” its been replaced by “Primary/Secondary” The folders on a default install look like this: drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 dynamic/-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 21992 Apr 2 23:37 named.conf.sample-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel uarch 3314 Apr 2 23:37 named.rootdrwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel uarch 5 Apr 16 11:31 primary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 secondary/drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind&nbs p; uarch 2 Apr 2 23:37 working/ So, now take a look at the Bind Mod ule in Webmin. Add a domain to the “Master” failsAdd a domain as a “Slave” fails. Not unexpected, as those folders aren’t there anymore. But anyway, figured I would point it out, since I know you have nothing else to do 😊 (and yes, I have it working, just requires a bit of fiddling) (maybe there is a new hidden Bind9 module?) Dave OvertonOwnerSYIX.COMsms or voice 530.755.1751 |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X