From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2007-11-12 22:33:10
|
On 11/Nov/2007 23:27 Cl=E9ment VERET wrote .. > 2007/11/9, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > > Hi Cl=E9ment, > > > > That is a good patch .. but I'm worried about how it will perform > > on non-Redhat RPM-based systems like SuSE and Mandrake, and even old > > Redhat systems before they started using system-auth . > > On _every_ redhat compliant system this patch will work. I tested it > at work where we have a patchwork of redhat distributions (from Fedora > Core 3 to RHEL 5, through Red Hat 7.2 and CentOS 3/4/5). > > I cannot be affirmative concerning Mandrake and SuSE... I don't really > know how this distributions work about their authentication. > > Is there somebody who has the ability to test it ? > > > Is it possible > > to have a pam.d/webmin file that somehow falls back to the old behavior > > in cases like these? > > I know PAM very well and I'm not sure this is possible... But I'm > gonna have a try... Let me know if you get anywhere with this. If not, a fallback would be to use this PAM config only on Redhat-based systems, determined at the time Webmin is installed in the RPM %post script. - Jamie |