From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2004-11-01 07:12:16
|
Hi Jamie, Jamie Cameron wrote: > Perhaps not all filesystems have a mount.XXX program, only those that > cannot be handled directly by the kernel .. > > So what is Webmin doing wrong exactly? Is it using /etc/fstab instead of > /etc/samba/sbmfstab , or can it not even mount SMBFS at all? [/etc/fstab -> /etc/samba/smbfstab] It uses /etc/fstab, which is not wrong in the first line. Compiling smb-shares in /etc/fstab is making the used login and password visible to any user on the system. According to the FAQ smb-shares whould be written to /etc/samba/smbfstab by default, because this is more safe. If you do a "ps -fax" as a normal user you will see login and password in the tree, whereas written down in /etc/samba/fstab it only shows that there is something mounted. Anyway a "cat" would make it visible, so it is just a chmod-modding by the admin to disallow this. SuSE 9.2 has an empty sbmfstab coming with the default rpm's. I cannot be sure for SuSE 9.1, but the mechanism should be as bot distros come with Samba v3.x [mount-errors] I can only be sure for SuSE 9.2. Using Webmin there is a syntax error happening. Mounting on the command line makes no problems. bis dahin - kind regards Martin Mewes -- ###################################################################### http://www.webmin.com/ http://webmin.mamemu.de/ Webbased Administration Tool for Unixoid Systems :-) Member of the Webmin Translation Team ###################################################################### |