From: Emmanuel S. <esa...@us...> - 2004-10-18 10:51:04
|
Le dim 17/10/2004 à 22:17, ra...@si... a écrit : hi, [...] > Besides the potential security issues, it makes it extremely difficult > to differentiate between the following: is it really more unsecure than type 3 (the type used by mailboxes to manage auth password)? type 3 should be ok for me if at least it used a "password" HTML type. I know that any user can always view HTML source and get the password, but it will be not displayed on the interface (so at least protected from other eyes). am I wrong? -> this was a user's feature request for my module (wbmtranslator) and I didn't know how to answer it without using the (in this case) confusing type 12. @jamie: I think I will use type 3 (even if it never hide password). so no need for new type 16. [...] thanks, bye |