From: <ra...@si...> - 2004-10-18 06:19:09
|
> > BTW, I am trying to understand why, as a configuration > > option, the current mechanism isn't suitable, as the configuration isn't > > intended to be called on each invocation of the module? > > You'll have to ask the module author who requested this feature about > this one :-) However, none of the core Webmin modules will use this new > type, for the reasons you mentioned .. > I was hoping to get a response on this from the module author(s), but to make things clean, this is an official request. Given the interesting programatic and security issues with this feature, as well as previous posts on the subject, why cannot the current mechanism be used, and if it is just because the form is confusing, what would make the form clear? I would hate to have an insecure feature implemented when all that was needed was better language or structure. Cheers! ---- Randy |