Re: [webmin-devel] [Webmin 1.139] Samba and Cifs

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 04:24, Martin Mewes wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
> 
> Am Montag, 29. März 2004 13:34 schrieb Jamie Cameron:
> 
> > Thanks for pointing that out - this is a bug in 1.139, that will be
> > fixed before the 1.140 release.
> >
> > How different are SMBFS and CIFS anyway? I have been assuming up to
> > now that they are pretty much just different names for the same
> > thing ..
> 
> In addition: I setup a fresh SuSE 9.0 and installed the latest 
> devel-rpm packages. Well in the RPM there is no CIFS, but SMBFS 
> instead.
> 
> Bug or Feature ;-) ?

The current 1.139 version of webmin looks for the mount.cifs command,
and if found assumes that CIFS is being used instead of SMBFS. Since
this is not the correct thing to do, version 1.140 will allow the use of
both.

Oddly, the latest Fedora seems to have replaced smbfs with cifs, which
is why I initially made that change.

 - Jamie