From: Larry G. <Li...@IS...> - 2003-10-28 05:26:03
|
All .cf files, with respect to custom rules, are treated equally. I can send you a custom rule file if want an example. Thanks Jamie! --Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Jamie Cameron > > Oops, I missed that comment. > > Being able to edit extra .cf files sounds like a good idea, > and probably not too hard to add support for. So are all .cf > files treated equally by spamassassin, or is local.cf special > in some way? > > - Jamie > > Larry Gilson <Li...@IS...> wrote .. > > I fully agree with you. But what are your thoughts about the .cf > > files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory? > > > > --Larry > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jamie Cameron > > > > > > I think that providing an interface for editing the > > > /usr/share/spamassassin files would not be too useful for > > > most people, as they are overwritten when upgrading, as you > > > wrote below. Also, they contain a huge number of rules that > > > would make the tables in the module's UI enormous .. > > > > > > - Jamie > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 02:05, Larry Gilson wrote: > > > > Hi Jamie, > > > > > > > > I installed the pre-release and have not noticed any > > > > issues. Thanks for the update, especially the SA support. I was > > > > wondering if you would consider expanding the custom rule support > > > > to include files in addition to local.cf. SA will parse any .cf > > > > file in both the /usr/share/spamassassin and > > > > /etc/mail/spamassassin. Most people avoid the > > > > /usr/share/spamassassin directory as any update will perform an > > > > 'rm -Rf' on that directory while leaving the > > > > /etc/mail/spamassassin alone. There are many people who are > > > > incorporating custom rules and would rather keep the rules in a > > > > file or files other than local.cf. > > > > > > > > I don't know how difficult this would be. You might be > > > > able to have an intermediate page that produces hyperlinks to all > > > > .cf files in a directory specified in the module config. Would > > > > this be difficult to incorporate? If so, could you keep it in > > > > mind for a possible future update? |