From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2003-10-06 22:28:45
|
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 22:35, jam...@te... wrote: > > That sounds like a pretty good solution as well - although the redhat > > version number should be 10 instead of 10.0, as redhat seems to have > > dropped the .0 in versions 8 and 9 :) > > Actually, Jamie, I am not sure that 10 would be appropriate, as what comes > out of Fedora does not seem to be > tied to the old versioning. Basically RH, is going to focus on their > enterprise products, while still giving internal > developer bandwidth to Fedora. The old non-commercial version of RH is for > all intensive purposes no more, > and what is in its places is the Fedora Core which comes from the Fedora > project. I guess the real question is what Redhat is going to call their next free release - will it be branded 'Redhat 10', or 'Fedora 1.0' ? That will determine the name that Webmin uses internally .. - Jamie |